What if PR for BF1943

**Krohn** · 06-07-09, 03:33 PM

Just curious if the people on here who play PR would play a WWII era PR modded for BF1943 after it comes out. WWII shooters have always been my favorite and I'd like to see the realism from PR added to that sub-genre.

**Blah64** · 06-07-09, 03:36 PM

You could always try some other games like 'Red Orchestra' or 'World War II Online'.
Those are WWII games with more realism.

**Talon2342** · 06-07-09, 03:44 PM

No thanks, 1943, will suck. And 32 player max limit... NOOOO thankx.

**MarioSpeedwagen** · 06-07-09, 04:13 PM

Originally Posted by Talon2342

No thanks, 1943, will suck. And 32 player max limit... NOOOO thankx.

32 per team or total?

**bust331** · 06-07-09, 04:15 PM

Originally Posted by MarioSpeedwagen

Originally Posted by Talon2342

No thanks, 1943, will suck. And 32 player max limit... NOOOO thankx.

32 per team or total?

24 players total...12 on each side.

**Blakeman** · 06-07-09, 04:30 PM

Forgotten Hope 1 & 2 are WW2 realism mods for BF2, but I think the low amount of players on 1943 will keep most modders away from it except in instances of squad vs squad tactics.

**Amador +JP2+** · 06-07-09, 05:10 PM

I have been drawn to the realism (although I get the feel that some efforts are overdone ... like disabling auto reload), the expansive and interesting battlefields, the large teams, and most of all the emphasis on teamwork. The emphasis on teamwork and asset allocation/use alone will often (although not always) weed out the "x" whores and many selfish players from the population. This helps to attract quality players and teammates, imho.

I would not mind a WWII version of this same experience and I would play it too ... but then, I was an avid DoD fan for several years before I migrated to BF2 and ultimately PR. The upgrade to the graphics and the engine would also be much appreciated! Smaller teams wouldn't be as attractive to me. I often wonder now how anyone can play a game with just 10 or 12 people on a map (let alone how I did it!). :P

**Krohn** · 06-08-09, 10:23 AM

I did not realise it was going to half smaller teams. To me that ruins the experience too. Its not much of a battle when there are only 12 guys on each side. I played Redp Orchestra, WWII Online, and DoD. They were all fun but WWII Online was so sparse when I played that it got boring and DoD was not very realistic and had no vehicles. Red O was quite fun and I was expecting 1943 to be a nice updated engine that could alleviate some of the BF2 shortcomings but if they are limiting it to 24 or even 32 players I just can't see it being as fun as a 64 person PR session.

**-Sauso-** · 06-08-09, 11:45 AM

forgotten hope was fun...with loads and loads of real vehicles.

haven't played it in ages though...looks like they have a new update coming out soon (Normandy)

**bust331** · 06-08-09, 06:51 PM

I think it's already out, I have 2.1....and fucking hate infantry combat. Prone, half second later, aim around the head and fire...instant headshot.

BS