Thread: Really?

Originally Posted by Pimp Trizkit

It speaks volumes about the mollies' balance that a lot of people are shying away from it, does it not? That's the point I'm making. We can sit here all day and argue about the reason(s), but that isn't doing much good, is it? We'll have to agree to disagree, but the numbers speak for themselves.

I just think it's pretty shitty to have a server sit empty because people don't want to man up. Of course, the mollies change things up..that's the point. That's why I was in favor of restricting them...just not totally. How many is too many? Well, it's already been shown that even three is too many. So, how about 2? 1? You go any lower than 2 per team ...and you may as well not even have them. So, what's the solution? Make both servers fully restricted just so people play on both of them? So, Valve makes a new CS game...and we strip it down so it plays a lot more like CS:S? Pretty boring if you ask me. How is that setting the standards for TeamPlay?

...or getting in the regular server, be positive...and play CS:GO as it was intended.

Do you prefer not having mollies? That's fine...just don't abandon the regular server all together, which is what has happened.

Or, maybe CSS was just fine the way it was, but all it needed was some graphics polish and better hitboxes. Just because something is new doesn't make it better. People like what they like. And this is a game. Players don't have to "man up" when they have options in a leisure activity. And who are you to decide which is the lesser option?

It's 1 more restriction. That's not exactly stripping it down. This has essentially become the awp argument v2.0. "It's part of the game" has never been a viable argument. You know that.

Originally Posted by Pimp Trizkit

Or, maybe CSS what just fine the way it was, and all it needed was some graphics polish and better hitboxes. Just because something is new doesn't make it better. People like what they like. And this is a game. Players don't have to "man up" when they have options in a leisure activity. And who are you to decide which is the lesser option?

It's 1 more restriction. That's not exactly stripping it down. This has essentially become the awp argument v2.0. "It's part of the game" has never been a viable argument. You know that.

lol...it is stripping it down. It's one of the MAJOR differences between CS:S and GO. ...and once more ...I'm all for restrictions, just not full blanket ones. It's just sad to see that the motto for people at TPG in regards to CS:GO has turned into "If we can't find a way to deal with a new gameplay element, we'll just take it out entirely."

What you're saying would make sense if all we had was a server that fully restricted mollies. As it is, we have 2, and 1 has them partially restricted. That's not full blanket. That's what we did with the awp in CSS. So, we're not talking new policy here.

What this really boils down to is you not being happy that what you like isn't what the majority of the players happen to like.

Originally Posted by Pimp Trizkit

What you're saying would make sense if all we had was a server that fully restricted mollies. As it is, we have 2, and 1 has them partially restricted. That's not full blanket. That's what we did with the awp in CSS. So, we're not talking new policy here.

What this really boils down to is you not being happy that what you like isn't what the majority of the players happen to like.

It does make sense ...because as it stands, the regular server might as well not even be there. No, what this really boils down to, is TPG willing to stay stagnant in regards to new gameplay elements. I've heard many on the regular server say that they would play on the molly server, but it's always empty. What that tells me is that regs and admins need to step up and prime both servers...not just one. Which, is the point of this entire thread.

And, again, I tell you this. People like what they like. You aren't changing anyone's opinion with this thread.

... then turns around and called people crybabies, for not sharing his stance. I'm sorry, but that's bull.

You remember saying that a while back when speaking of someone else? How are you different in this thread? People aren't playing in the molly server, so they must not have any balls, right? Get over yourself, Guyver.

Originally Posted by Pimp Trizkit

And, again, I tell you this. People like what they like. You aren't changing anyone's opinion with this thread.



You remember saying that a while back when speaking of someone else? How are you different in this thread? People aren't playing in the molly server, so they must not have any balls, right? Get over yourself, Guyver.

Get over yourself, Pimp. If you want to stay stuck in the past, suit yourself.