Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Tom Clancy's End War

  1. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    09-16-07
    Posts
    574
    Post Thanks / Like
    #11

    Re: Tom Clancy's End War

    Quote Originally Posted by Cecil900
    Quote Originally Posted by Arreo
    Huh. That looks really good.

    My first thought was. This is looks like what Frontlines FOW was supposed to be.

    Then my second thought was "damn, I hope it doesn't turn out like FFOW"
    Its Ubisoft, there is hope for this game.
    Really? You think BECAUSE Ubisoft is making it that is going to make it better? My experience has been quite the contrary. Ubisoft games are typically under developed and released with numerous bugs. Look at any of their simulation games (IL-2, Silent Hunter series, even games like Rainbow 6 and Ghost Recon) and they had to be patched 2 or 3 times to be playable. After that you have the issue of Ubi's TERRIBLE multiplayer support. They're game search clients are some of the worst in the business.

  2. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    08-21-06
    Posts
    9,052
    Post Thanks / Like
    #12

    Re: Tom Clancy's End War

    Who honestly plays Ghost Recon online though, seriously. That game is just fun for single player, same with Vegas unless it's coop play. I love ubisoft games, they are the best. Splinter Cell for the win!

  3. Exiled
    Join Date
    03-23-07
    Posts
    6,566
    Post Thanks / Like
    #13

    Re: Tom Clancy's End War

    Quote Originally Posted by Wurzzzz
    Quote Originally Posted by Cecil900
    Quote Originally Posted by Arreo
    Huh. That looks really good.

    My first thought was. This is looks like what Frontlines FOW was supposed to be.

    Then my second thought was "damn, I hope it doesn't turn out like FFOW"
    Its Ubisoft, there is hope for this game.
    Really? You think BECAUSE Ubisoft is making it that is going to make it better? My experience has been quite the contrary. Ubisoft games are typically under developed and released with numerous bugs. Look at any of their simulation games (IL-2, Silent Hunter series, even games like Rainbow 6 and Ghost Recon) and they had to be patched 2 or 3 times to be playable. After that you have the issue of Ubi's TERRIBLE multiplayer support. They're game search clients are some of the worst in the business.
    In MY experience Ubisoft is one of the best game publishers today. Much better than EA.

    So yes, i do think because Ubisoft is making it it is going to be better, because Ubisoft has credibility with me. And talking about patches, every patch that EA release makes the game worse.

    The Tom Clancy series games are single player primary games, where the game is designed for singe player, not multiplayer.

    Ubisoft was the publisher for Far Cry, which was a great game in itself.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Title