Thread: If TPG had a Bad Company 2 server and a public TS instance

Originally Posted by JBMCW2010

It is a poll, why folks reading into it?

Who knows maybe the people can pass a referendum?

For those that the poll is intended for, there is no reading into that needs to be done.

I voted no. Simple answer: hosting a server under the TPG name and providing a public TS server would be ludicrous. I would not play on it.

Elaboration: None of our other games have EVER needed a third party VOIP platform as a permanent solution. To suddenly turn our back on that would be a violation of TPG standard. I realize there's nothing written in stone, but some unspoken rules are more important than those that a silly document or forum post says are the rules.

However, someone will need to dedicate a lot of time to watching the TS instance, and if we go through with this, I will volunteer my time to play watchdog with the TS sections.

Our ideals are more important. Don't let the fact that a bunk game with a lame ass manufacturer screwed over the PC market, the very people that put it on the map to begin with (for that genre). We don't bow to anyone...they kiss OUR ass!

The question is would you, if there were a public TS instance. The question is not about what upper management has said in the past.

Originally Posted by Allane

None of our other games have EVER needed a third party VOIP platform as a permanent solution.

TPG has hosted games that needed external VOIP for a period of time in the past. It has happened before. Just saying.