Results 1 to 10 of 149
Thread: Syrian weapons of mass destruction
-
07-15-12, 08:18 AM #1
Syrian weapons of mass destruction
'US believes Syria moving part of chemical... JPost - Middle East
Remember those chemicals that were hauling ass across the Iraqi border into Syria before Operation Freedom?
In my belief, this is where a majority of them went, seeing how we have satellite video of the trucks hauling them over there and got our hands on some of the pilots that were flying them over there in transport planes. Dr. Germ confirmed these stock piles, and verified the information that we had was probably accurate.
'US believes Syria moving part of chemical... JPost - Middle East
-
07-15-12, 11:57 AM #2
Re: Syrian weapons of mass destruction
Big mistake if they turn around and use a part of that stock pile. You can bet that we will be going if that happens. Hopefully it is just a move to secure the weapons.
-
-
07-15-12, 11:14 PM #4
Re: Syrian weapons of mass destruction
Yeah, and 9/11 was an inside job, the Holocaust never happened, and LBJ/FBI/KGB/Cubans killed JFK. Your "belief" that weapons were moved from Iraq to Syria is an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory cooked up to justify the Iraq War after the WMD justification was shown to be a lie. The Iraqi general who asserted this never actually saw any weapons moved himself and has never divulged the names of the pilots supposedly involved.
Report Finds No Evidence Syria Hid Iraqi Arms
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/26/in...erland&emc=rss
Without any real evidence, I see no reason to take this seriously. Now, is it a scary thought of Assad using his own stockpiles against his people? Absolutely. It's terrifying, actually. But those or SYRIAN stockpiles, not hidden IRAQI ones.
-
-
07-16-12, 01:20 AM #6
Re: Syrian weapons of mass destruction
you are ignorant and the only dunce in the room that doesn't know about Dr.Germ that created these weapons and produced the documentations and videos of the experiments, that you DON'T want to see, because you would never be the same after seeing some of this crap. But, we know you are all in your own closed minded little world, so you just keep on reading the NYtimes and swallow that liberal garbage they feed you.... An Iraqi general didn't know about the weapons, big deal, maybe he did, maybe he didn't.... I'm sure you believe him, they never lie huh? Dr. Germ was in our custody for a couple years. She cooperated well. You see, she backed up her story with documents, videos, and evidence, unlike your nytime general. Like a kid jumping up and down in the room, thinking you know it all, with a big ass Dunce hat on your head..... Show some more ignorance kid.
And no, I'm not going to waste my time trying to school you or debate with you illogical ignorance, maybe one day you will pull your head or nose out of the weak boy's assholes, but I doubt it, hence not worth my time.
-
07-16-12, 01:26 AM #7
Re: Syrian weapons of mass destruction
Calling someone a kid isn't the best way to try to prove a point...
-
07-16-12, 01:33 AM #8
Re: Syrian weapons of mass destruction
I don't want us to get too involved in Syria either... I would rather send in an SO team to secure the really nasty weapons and then bomb the shit out of their military and let the civil war begin on a more equal playing field. The rebels secured them a tank the other day and getting after it, however I don't know if they still got it or not.... This was 3 or 4 days ago and they were have quite a bit of fun with it.
Crappy part of the deal, if we do secure the chemicals, what about the Plutonium ? and where is all that at and how much do they have in how many locations and we don't really know what all they have and where and that's bad, because they fund terrorist and Hezbollah will certainly be involved, because Iran is controlling all the factions there, including the Syrian regime.
So bottom line, it's going to get real nasty and nastier over there then they have ever experienced in the past. It's going to be hard, devastating, and fast. The terrorist have built up their arsenals and dug in deep into the populations, which is bad for the civilians, so some are already leaving, but all the civilians that don't want to get hit in the crossfire, better get to packing and moving out, because they don't have much time left.
I imagine, that once Iran starts getting their ass squashed, which is around the corner at any minute, Iran is going to make the call to strike to all their goons, which in my opinion is better, that way we unleash hell with our partners and put the dog down quick and get past it and back to business.
-
-
07-16-12, 09:02 AM #10
Re: Syrian weapons of mass destruction
Lol, ok buddy, listen up. That report the NYTimes is talking about came from the Iraq Study Group. The ISG was a bipartisan commission started by a Republican during GWB's administration. They found no evidence linking Iraqi weapons to Syria. I've searched for these supposed documents you say Dr. Taha had, yet, unsurprisingly, I've found no mention of them and the ISG never references them! You say I'm the ignorant kid who believes liberal garbage? You're the one who believes invented conspiracy theories with no evidence. You're as bad as the Truthers and just as gullible. Grow up.
With all the warmongering you seem to support, does that mean you are going to volunteer to fight these wars? Or are you going to be like every Republican warmonger in Congress?
That seems to be the case, apparently. Yay for double standards.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks