A victory for union workers everywhere.

**CivilWars** · 11-18-12, 07:32 PM

As I said, I don't support the executives getting raises while the company continues to decline. I still would like to see a follow-up article in about 6 months to see if the union workers still feel like they made the right choice.

**DJ Ms. White** · 11-18-12, 08:32 PM

Originally Posted by CivilWars

As I said, I don't support the executives getting raises while the company continues to decline. I still would like to see a follow-up article in about 6 months to see if the union workers still feel like they made the right choice.

Their pensions are gone so I think not.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I727 using Tapatalk 2

**~BigTymer~** · 11-18-12, 09:56 PM

Originally Posted by CivilWars

I would bet just more people eating Little Debbies and Bimbo Bakery products. I just think they should be proud of not giving in to the 8% pay cut. They clearly won that battle.

truly it wasn't a 8% cut. They was to cut 8%, then add 2% back after a year or two, then add another 2% after that, so really it was 4%

**~BigTymer~** · 11-18-12, 09:57 PM

Originally Posted by CivilWars

That will show those corporate big shots who is really boss around here.

Hostess to close, lay off 18,500 after 'crippling' union fight | Fox News

Just another reason why comps. move over seas

**~BigTymer~** · 11-18-12, 10:01 PM

Originally Posted by triggerhappy2005

I want a ho ho.

I'm sure if you go down the corner you can find a hairy arm pit/legged tramp

**WickedTribe** · 11-19-12, 01:20 AM

Originally Posted by ~BigTymer~

truly it wasn't a 8% cut. They was to cut 8%, then add 2% back after a year or two, then add another 2% after that, so really it was 4%

That's already been established. It's still a permanent cut, while in two months, the execs getting their big raises back.

**Morningfrost** · 11-19-12, 10:55 AM

Originally Posted by WickedTribe

That's already been established. It's still a permanent cut, while in two months, the execs getting their big raises back.

Also worthy of note, the execs would have gotten their pay back rather quickly (2 months down the line, I believe), while the employees would've had to wait a year or two according to BT, before they could get the first 2% back. I'd also like to point out that it wasn't guaranteed the employees would get that 4% back, merely that it was possible.

~Morningfrost