Results 31 to 35 of 35
Thread: Real (aka old) statistical methodology vs. new
-
-
12-07-12, 03:58 PM #32
Real (aka old) statistical methodology vs. new
I just posted the methodology twice now. You know exactly what they are. If you're so interested you can go do the math for yourself. I'm not going to go do the math for you. Or you can pay someone else to do it, which is basically what this guy offers on his site.
Whatever man. Good luck with your propagation of the myth that the economy is recovering as we extend our credit to record highs to prop up a fake recovery, and don't stop the spending spree.
What's sad is you know it's true (unless of course you are delusional, which I doubt) that our economy is about to crash but you'd attack me as a conspiracy nut instead of have a rational discussion about this because it might make your dear leader Obama look bad. It's sick, really. Good luck with that.
-
-
12-07-12, 05:26 PM #34
Re: Real (aka old) statistical methodology vs. new
No, you haven't posted the methodology at all. Do you even know what that is? All you've posted is a pretty graphic and a pretty graph and then told me what was on the graph. You have yet to show me how he got the estimates he came up with to arbitrarily add to the official unemployment statistics. And you continue to refuse to provide that methodology. Laz fail again.
Oh, and look at this:
Unemployment rate drops to 7.7% as economy shrugs off Hurricane Sandy - The Washington Post
But if we use the Lazarus-approved method of finding the REAL unemployment rate, which is apparently just making up numbers to prop up his belief, does that mean it's really at 34.2%? I could even make you a pretty graph that shows that, too, because apparently any graph is considered enough evidence.
Are we going to see you on a show of Doomsday Preppers anytime soon? You've never been interested in any real discussion and you are making that clear right now! I ask you to show me the methodology so I can see how they get these estimates myself, and you refuse to do so! I've asked 3 times now and you've said no every time. How can you say you want a rational discussion when you refuse to answer perfectly reasonable requests for more information? You're full of shit and everyone here knows it.
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks