Results 61 to 70 of 99
Thread: The numbers don't lie.
-
01-14-13, 01:34 PM #61
Re: The numbers don't lie.
No, Eugenics was not primarily about anti-retarded. Plus you are defending a completely disgusting human being, all to support your view on abortion! Come on man. Let me educate you some more. Here are some actual quotes from Sanger taken from Margaret Sanger, Founder of Planned Parenthood, In Her Own Words :
On blacks, immigrants and indigents:
"...human weeds,' 'reckless breeders,' 'spawning... human beings who never should have been born." Margaret Sanger, Pivot of Civilization, referring to immigrants and poor people
On sterilization & racial purification:
Sanger believed that, for the purpose of racial "purification," couples should be rewarded who chose sterilization. Birth Control in America, The Career of Margaret Sanger, by David Kennedy, p. 117, quoting a 1923 Sanger speech.
On the purpose of birth control:
The purpose in promoting birth control was "to create a race of thoroughbreds," she wrote in the Birth Control Review, Nov. 1921 (p. 2)
On the rights of the handicapped and mentally ill, and racial minorities:
"More children from the fit, less from the unfit -- that is the chief aim of birth control." Birth Control Review, May 1919, p. 12
On the extermination of blacks:
"We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population," she said, "if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." Woman's Body, Woman's Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America, by Linda Gordon
There are several problems with what you have done here. The first is that you assume equivalency between total minority makeup and the female population. Next, you lump in women that could not or would never have an abortion. Let me repeat the quote from the source I cited since you completely ignored what it said to support your point:
Minority women constitute only about 13% of the female population (age 15-44) in the United States, but they underwent approximately 36% of the abortions.
Given that the stated purpose as I have quoted with Sanger was to eliminate blacks or as she liked to call them, "human weeds", and prevent their proliferation, I'd say she was pretty damned successful. And suckers like you buy into the bullshit. Of course abortion was a part of a eugenics program designed to keep minorities from proliferating. That's a FACT. It's been widely successful, so let's call it what it is - genocide. If it makes you uncomfortable to hear that because you like abortion that's not really my problem to deal with. I'll stick to the facts.
Yeah um, no. What you said was:
"In the case of homicide, for example, it doesn't matter how developed the child/fetus is. If it doesn't take a breath, it's not considered homicide, it's considered an illegal abortion. If it DOES take a breath before you kill it, it's considered homicide."
And that is completely, 100% incorrect, and you just contradicted yourself.
Now I think maybe we should get back to the topic of gun control. I have high hopes that you can speak more intelligently about that than you do about abortion.
You want abortion to be legal, ok I respect your right to want that. But if you want it, you need to be intellectually honest about every aspect of the morality of what it is. Frankly, this is the main reason I hate abortion and will never support it. That and, being adopted and born in Torrance, CA - if I had been conceived 4 years later than I was, I probably would have been one of those aborted children.
-
01-14-13, 01:36 PM #62
Re: The numbers don't lie.
So equal rights among Americans was started then? I forgot that women and minorities could vote immediately after the constitution was produced..
No... We changed it later when we realized it was time for a change. I don't hear anyone complaining about breaking the presidential oath on that one..
-
01-14-13, 01:40 PM #63
Re: The numbers don't lie.
-
- Join Date
- 02-13-07
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX
- Posts
- 42,785
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 5
01-14-13, 01:41 PM #64Re: The numbers don't lie.
Oh, now I get it. Thanks.
I don't care so much about the presidential oath as I think the first priority of every president recently has been to A) get re-elected and B) keep his party in the driver's seat when he can no longer be re-elected. I just enjoy the hypocrisy of people that scream "my rights" while infringing on the rights of others.-Lazarus- liked this post
-
01-14-13, 01:46 PM #65
Re: The numbers don't lie.
Don't get into technicalities... The bill of rights is part of the constitution so let's not even tread down that path...
I'm just saying that things over time need some resurfacing. I highly doubt that our founding fathers dreamed of mounting miniguns on their homes.
-
01-14-13, 01:49 PM #66
Re: The numbers don't lie.
I think they did consider just that thing when they wrote it. The right wasn't for us to be able to impress our neighbors. Its was to able to remove a government with the ideals of its people no longer in mind. That means you have to be able to match fire power with fire power and why they didn't specify muskets and single shot reloaders.
-
- Join Date
- 02-13-07
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX
- Posts
- 42,785
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 5
-
01-14-13, 02:07 PM #68
Re: The numbers don't lie.
I just it funny with how everything was becoming more advanced during their time period just as it is ours that people didn't think they thought firearms would also advance. Most of them were kids when the first firearm was invented and they watched it evolve up to flint lock pistols and rifles before they wrote the constitution. Why would they think it was going to stop there?
Shit one of them even got to see the peacekeeper.Last edited by deathgodusmc; 01-14-13 at 02:10 PM.
-
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks