Creation vs. Evolution - A new look at an old argument

**phidan** · 03-23-13, 10:31 PM

"Secularists use god's laws of logic to argue against the christian position. Nowt hat isn't going to work is it? His position is self refuting"

lol...what?

Empiricists believe that all truths are proved by empirical reasoning. Since an empiricist cannot prove that all truths can be derived by empirical reasoning, empiricism should be rejected. YET.. he claims to be an empiricist when talking about the same slide. DERP

**SovietDooM** · 03-23-13, 10:50 PM

If there is intelligent design, then why is the vagina so close to the butt-hole?

**deathgodusmc** · 03-23-13, 10:59 PM

Originally Posted by SovietDooM

If there is intelligent design, then why is the vagina so close to the butt-hole?

Because it would look stupid and make it to hard to have sex if it was in the middle of her back.

**phidan** · 03-23-13, 11:07 PM

Originally Posted by SovietDooM

If there is intelligent design, then why is the vagina so close to the butt-hole?

so you can play with both simultaneously

**Warprosper** · 03-23-13, 11:13 PM

I stopped listening when he said "I've seen comets be destroyed". Not only is this guy completely illiterate, his theories are backed by your typical creationism believer, not your typical scientist.

**Gumby** · 03-24-13, 03:43 AM

Originally Posted by SovietDooM

If there is intelligent design, then why is the vagina so close to the butt-hole?

And God did teacheth man The Shocker and saw that it was good.

Gesendet von meinem Galaxy S3 mit Tapatalk.

**Gumby** · 03-24-13, 03:56 AM

So back on topic here with some anecdotal evidence. My wife truly believes in a higher power. But she also completely accepts all real science. The two do not have to be exclusive. Much like Einstein, she sees science as simply a forensic study of how God did his work. I don't have a problem with her viewpoint. She is also against teaching creationism in public schools. In her case I think that's because she thinks creationism is really poor science. Good science doesn't make the evidence fit a predetermined conclusion. Any time there is a newsworthy story about creationism vs science, I always hear her yelling at the TV that there doesn't have to be an argument. What I don't understand is why all creationists are not like her. They seem to want to limit the power of an entity they all claim is omnipotent.

Gesendet von meinem Galaxy S3 mit Tapatalk.

**deathgodusmc** · 03-24-13, 07:03 AM

Originally Posted by SovietDooM

If there is intelligent design, then why is the vagina so close to the butt-hole?

I thought of another reason. Its for mans amusement. The look on their face when you get going to much and it slips.

**triggerhappy2005** · 03-24-13, 08:06 AM

Originally Posted by Gumby

So back on topic here with some anecdotal evidence. My wife truly believes in a higher power. But she also completely accepts all real science. The two do not have to be exclusive. Much like Einstein, she sees science as simply a forensic study of how God did his work. I don't have a problem with her viewpoint. She is also against teaching creationism in public schools. In her case I think that's because she thinks creationism is really poor science. Good science doesn't make the evidence fit a predetermined conclusion. Any time there is a newsworthy story about creationism vs science, I always hear her yelling at the TV that there doesn't have to be an argument. What I don't understand is why all creationists are not like her. They seem to want to limit the power of an entity they all claim is omnipotent.

Gesendet von meinem Galaxy S3 mit Tapatalk.

Creationism is not poor science.

It isn't science at all.

To call it poor science is to lend it credibility which it doesn't deserve.