Thread: Equal application if the law for Congress?

Rand Paul pushes constitutional amendment on Congress - Burgess Everett - POLITICO.com

This is brilliant. I would wholeheartedly support this amendment should it be put to a vote for ratification. What say you guys?

Well it only took them 237 years to put something out there rest of us have been saying since the beginning. Maybe in another 200 years it'll pass a vote.

Amendments can happen. It just takes a lot of public support. Too bad Honey Boo Boo is on.... :-(

Sent from my S3 using Tapatalk

Couldn't find Rabble Rabble Rabble.

I'd vote for it.

The Insider Trading law had it, then Congress/senate removed it.

Originally Posted by SmokenScion

I'd vote for it.

The Insider Trading law had it, then Congress/senate removed it.

Lots of people who are engaged in what these guys are doing would support this and the other piece: term limits. Too bad we are a tiny minority. There is a reason Roman Emperors made sure to keep the Collosseum (spelling?) open. They knew, as our current leaders know, that if you keep most of the population entertained and distracted they won't be paying attention to what the leaders are up to. How many people do you know who say things like "I am not interested in politics"? To not be interested is to fail as a citizen.

Sent from my S3 using Tapatalk

Originally Posted by Gumby

Lots of people who are engaged in what these guys are doing would support this and the other piece: term limits. Too bad we are a tiny minority. There is a reason Roman Emperors made sure to keep the Collosseum (spelling?) open. They knew, as our current leaders know, that if you keep most of the population entertained and distracted they won't be paying attention to what the leaders are up to. How many people do you know who say things like "I am not interested in politics"? To not be interested is to fail as a citizen.

Sent from my S3 using Tapatalk

I'd take the Time to Reply but I'm finishing up on the Duck Dynasty Marathon.