Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456
Results 51 to 55 of 55

Thread: US General bashes Obama Administration

  1. Registered TeamPlayer deputyfestus's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-28-07
    Location
    East Texas
    Posts
    7,960
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    9
    Stat Links

    US General bashes Obama Administration US General bashes Obama Administration US General bashes Obama Administration
    #51

    Re: US General bashes Obama Administration

    Quote Originally Posted by triggerhappy2005 View Post
    To be fair Scott, he probably was in proximity of some action but most likely not directly involved. I can't imagine a 3 or 4 star general being allowed in combat. The loss would be potentially too great.
    In the theater yes on the front line no.

  2. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    10-04-06
    Posts
    7,412
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    US General bashes Obama Administration US General bashes Obama Administration
    #52

    Re: US General bashes Obama Administration

    Quote Originally Posted by deputyfestus View Post
    In the theater yes on the front line no.
    That's exactly what I meant.

  3. Registered TeamPlayer jason_jinx's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-27-05
    Location
    Houston, Tejas
    Posts
    12,428
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    US General bashes Obama Administration US General bashes Obama Administration US General bashes Obama Administration
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: BIGTEX JsnJinx PSN ID: jasonjinx Steam ID: jasonjinx
    #53
    The new general is suppose to change the rules of engagement to make it easier for the troops.

    Commander, your response?

  4. Exiled
    Join Date
    05-06-07
    Posts
    6,036
    Post Thanks / Like
    #54

    Re: US General bashes Obama Administration

    This is from a correspondence with one of my bros from STA platoon who mustanged and is now a CO of a Bn leaving for Afghanistan in a few months..........
    Judgment, loyalty, and the perspective of the Afghan population. General McChrystal exercised deplorable judgment when he allowed a reporter from the Rolling Stone (whose girlfriend was killed in Iraq in 2007) to follow him and his entourage in to every intimate detail of their lives together. This is not the first time his judgment has left something to be desired. General McChrystal was responsible for covering up the Pat Tillman friendly fire incident. His loyalty is also a central issue. The Commander-in-Chief needs the loyalty of his subordinates. Whether it's Lincoln with McClellan, Truman with MacArthur, or Obama with McChrystal. The American balance of power must tilt toward the President. General McChrystal did not make any disloyal comments publicly or officially but by allowing the Rolling Stone reporter behind closed doors he didn't have to. Remember when we were LCpls and they told us when we deal with reporters to remember there is no such thing as "off the record"? Same thing is true in this case and the General had to know that, which means what he said was intended for publication. Finally, the most important reason, the Afghan people whose hearts and minds we're trying to win. In their tribal culture, power is all that matters. From their perspective, the Chief of the American tribe was insulted by a lesser chief. If the President had not taken action, it would have lessened his esteem in the eyes of the Afghans and, by extension, weakened our efforts there. The war is bigger than any one man and the President's decision (perhaps not intentionally) reflects that fact.

    I wish General Mattis had replaced him, but General Petraeus is a good man too.

  5. Registered TeamPlayer ***COMMANDER***'s Avatar
    Join Date
    05-19-06
    Posts
    17,813
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    US General bashes Obama Administration US General bashes Obama Administration
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: 76561197983313098
    #55
    Quote Originally Posted by jason_jinx View Post
    The new general is suppose to change the rules of engagement to make it easier for the troops.

    Commander, your response?
    That's the talk, however petraeus has been in these very meetings the whole time, so it's not fresh on him, but I do think that there will have to be some changes especially since the light and the weight is all on him now. I think he will grant the change. The troops are counting on him.


    Sent from my T-Mobile myTouch 3G using Tapatalk

Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst 123456

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Title