Results 1 to 10 of 16
Thread: StarChild - Extra-terrestrial?
-
-
08-31-10, 05:49 PM #2
Re: StarChild - Extra-terrestrial?
Kinda neat....
http://www.starchildproject.com/
-
-
-
-
08-31-10, 09:18 PM #6
Re: StarChild - Extra-terrestrial?
Some quick research shows that in 1999, DNA test was done and it was determined to be human with human parents due to the existence of human sex chromosomes. In 2003, mtDNA was used to determine the two skulls belonged to Native America halpogroups. In short, I don't buy this story. Birth defect makes the most logical sense and the evidence fits.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starchild_skull
There are a lot of "it could be"s, hypotheticals, and the only "evidence" that this is alien is that there is no match to link it to humans in the NIH database. The lack of evidence is not evidence for something else. Instead of accepting the fact that the mtDNA is pretty much bulletproof evidence that the skulls are human, he tries to invent a crazy story about surrogate alien babies. They really have no evidence, but they already have a conclusion and are trying to force the square facts into their round hole, which is the typical MO of conspiracy theorists.
-
08-31-10, 09:32 PM #7Re: StarChild - Extra-terrestrial?
No, it doesn't, and the fact that it has human X and Y chromosomes shows that it had two human parents. The chances that extra-terrestrial life that originated independently would use the same coding mechanisms is pretty infinitesimal. The idea that it would have X and Y identical to ours is simply ludicrous. This is pesudoscience, and every bit as silly as creationism.
-
-
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks