Thread: New Wikileaks

Just saying but he's been polite. As has DG. Both, it appears, are frustrating each other though over this very circular discussion rife with intentional omission.


With that said - any of yall see this little tidbit get leaked?

WikiLeaks: The Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Confirmed, Again | The Weekly Standard
Jawad Jabber Sadkhan - The Guantánamo Docket
Hassan Abdul Said - The Guantánamo Docket

Originally Posted by Alundil

Just saying but he's been polite. As has DG. Both, it appears, are frustrating each other though over this very circular discussion rife with intentional omission.


With that said - any of yall see this little tidbit get leaked?

WikiLeaks: The Iraq-Al Qaeda Connection Confirmed, Again | The Weekly Standard
Jawad Jabber Sadkhan - The Guantánamo Docket
Hassan Abdul Said - The Guantánamo Docket

What would the intentional omission be?

Originally Posted by Alundil

Just saying but he's been polite. As has DG. Both, it appears, are frustrating each other though over this very circular discussion rife with intentional omission.

Thanks Al, I thought so too, but I'll be a good citizen and abide by the will of the impartial admin.

You're welcome Wicked

Originally Posted by deathgodusmc

What would the intentional omission be?

Simply the fact that both of you are typically either,

assuming some things that are taken as common knowledge (even though not all are) and walking in to a "debate" with them
or
arguing side issues and minor points of diction as opposed to stepping past them to move the discussion forward on a larger scale


Either way - it's fun to read, probably less so for the two of you as it requires constant restating of point/counterpoint to score a point

Originally Posted by Alundil

You're welcome Wicked



Simply the fact that both of you are typically either,

assuming some things that are taken as common knowledge (even though not all are) and walking in to a "debate" with them
or
arguing side issues and minor points of diction as opposed to stepping past them to move the discussion forward on a larger scale


Either way - it's fun to read, probably less so for the two of you as it requires constant restating of point/counterpoint to score a point

LOL acttually i find the debates interesting regardless of whats going on. It just gets to a point at times where its never going to get any farther. At that point it just makes sense to call it a day.