Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 19 of 19

Thread: Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP

  1. Registered TeamPlayer Glitch's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-08-07
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    1,785
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: GlitchKs Steam ID: GlitchKs
    #11

    Re: Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP

    If the red team ever drops the religious right extremists I will shed my blue for white.

    Until then I just can't support the religious intolerance that they have for anyone that doesn't agree with their twisted views so blue I stay.
    Likes DJ Ms. White liked this post

  2. Registered TeamPlayer SmokenScion's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-27-06
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    11,452
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    13
    Stat Links

    Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: SmokenScion SmokenScion's Originid: SmokenScion
    #12

    Re: Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP

    :facepalm:
    Last edited by SmokenScion; 09-09-11 at 02:40 PM.

  3. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    11-18-07
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    5,560
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: godthark
    #13

    Re: Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP

    Quote Originally Posted by Red_Lizard2 View Post
    There is always the libertarian party if they ever get their heads out of their asses (they seem to be taking in the "fiscal libertarians" who still like social conservative policies lately, which is highly disappointing)
    Yep, libertarians are, unfortunately, generally a bit too far off into the extremes of economic conservatism, and most of them are still very socially conservative. There's absolutely no reason why religious extremism needs to be tied to the desire for smaller government. Hell, when you get into things like the DOMA, the philosophies conflict completely. Unfortunately, with the two-party system, this kind of bundling is unavoidable.

  4. Registered TeamPlayer BruceBloodMaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-15-07
    Posts
    1,679
    Post Thanks / Like
    #14

    Re: Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP

    The same thing was said in the 60's about JFK that because he was catholic that the Pope was going to Run the Country.... did it happen No. So I just don't understand all the flap about Social Conservatives. I just want someone who will Run the Country I could care less about his religion ! Last I heard there still is Freedom of Religion.... pray to whoever or whatever floats your boat ! You have religious zealots in All Religions from evengalists to radical muslims but I think the Majority of people fall somewhere in the middle. When the Jehova's Witnesses come to the door I say .... Not Interested and slam the door.

  5. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    04-17-07
    Posts
    20,817
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    4
    #15
    Quote Originally Posted by Pint View Post
    Well this is longer then I anticipated, but I think being a 'party isolationist' is a very very bad stance to take would be the long and short.


    I keep hoping, maybe foolishly, that the repubs can get back to basic conservativism so there is a contrast of government philosophy that is viable for people who think the social issues of the current gang are repugnant. During the height of the civil rights movement of the 60's you had the anti-black bunch dispersed between both parties, the end result was the issue could of resolved with out one party loosing a disproportionate amount of face by conceding the virtue of the argument. The same is true with state/church separation, both parties had members that crossed the line, the turn of the century socialist Christian movement gave us lots of religious language and notions that should never of been admitted, and the extreme right Catholic group did the same during the commie scare of the 50's. Now all the haters are in one party in regards to homosexuals, now all the Christian nation folks are in the same party as well. It's dangerous shit.

    I try my best to keep tabs on the right even though I dislike most of them, and in some cases have thinking on some of the philosophy they spread an actual feeling of rage, but the simple fact of the matter is we need two functioning parties who don't have a divide along social issue lines. It puts people like me who aren't dogmatic about fundamental right/left stances in a position where we can't vote republican because of the absolutely immoral and or ignorant stances they take. Give me the Jeffersonian and Linconite Repubs back please.

    PoB
    This

    Sent via highly charged bolt of electricity.

  6. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    04-17-07
    Posts
    20,817
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    4
    #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Red_Lizard2 View Post
    There is always the libertarian party if they ever get their heads out of their asses (they seem to be taking in the "fiscal libertarians" who still like social conservative policies lately, which is highly disappointing)
    This

    Sent via highly charged bolt of electricity.

  7. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    04-17-07
    Posts
    20,817
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    4
    #17
    Quote Originally Posted by WickedTribe View Post
    Yep, libertarians are, unfortunately, generally a bit too far off into the extremes of economic conservatism, and most of them are still very socially conservative. There's absolutely no reason why religious extremism needs to be tied to the desire for smaller government. Hell, when you get into things like the DOMA, the philosophies conflict completely. Unfortunately, with the two-party system, this kind of bundling is unavoidable.
    This too. Fucking humans....scourge of the earth.

    Sent via highly charged bolt of electricity.

  8. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    11-18-07
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    5,560
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: godthark
    #18

    Re: Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP

    Quote Originally Posted by BruceBloodMaster View Post
    The same thing was said in the 60's about JFK that because he was catholic that the Pope was going to Run the Country.... did it happen No. So I just don't understand all the flap about Social Conservatives. I just want someone who will Run the Country I could care less about his religion ! Last I heard there still is Freedom of Religion.... pray to whoever or whatever floats your boat ! You have religious zealots in All Religions from evengalists to radical muslims but I think the Majority of people fall somewhere in the middle. When the Jehova's Witnesses come to the door I say .... Not Interested and slam the door.
    I'm not sure what this has to do with freedom of religion.

  9. Registered TeamPlayer Red_Lizard2's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-28-07
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    13,490
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    5
    Stat Links

    Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: theredlizard2
    #19

    Re: Republican debate from tonight, 07SEP

    Quote Originally Posted by WickedTribe View Post
    Yep, libertarians are, unfortunately, generally a bit too far off into the extremes of economic conservatism, and most of them are still very socially conservative. There's absolutely no reason why religious extremism needs to be tied to the desire for smaller government. Hell, when you get into things like the DOMA, the philosophies conflict completely. Unfortunately, with the two-party system, this kind of bundling is unavoidable.
    The economics is an issue for me as well. I don't know why they keep putting up socially conservative candidates to be honest though, just reading through their platform they seem to be heavily for libertarian ideas in social issues, yet their nominees don't always seem to agree. Speaking of DOMA, this is a great article and what their candidates all should believe:
    The Gay Agenda | Libertarian Party
    Quote Originally Posted by Pat Dixon, Libertarian Party of Texas Chairman
    The former Libertarian Party member who sent me the nice note above probably never understood the principles of individual liberty. Sometimes people come to the Libertarian Party because they don't think Republicans have done enough to reduce taxation and spending. However, they fail to appreciate that individual liberty is just as important as economic liberty. When we publicize our legislative agenda which includes the position to "legalize homosexuality," some current Libertarian Party members crawl back to the Republicans. That is where they belong...

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Title