BCS Championship Game Thread

**Consultant** · 01-09-09, 09:24 AM

Now go play USC.

That's what everybody wants to see.

**Rage!** · 01-09-09, 11:31 AM

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/footbal...v=ap&type=lgns

what a crock of shit...Utah is ranked #2, come the fuck on...

discuss

**CivilWars** · 01-09-09, 11:34 AM

Nothing matters but number 1 these days. Who cares who is number 2, who should have been number 1 or 2 before the championship game, or who thinks they should get a shot at Florida now. If Utah wanted to be #1 they should have scheduled a tougher non-conference schedule to make up for their weak conference. If USC wanted to be #1 they should have beat OSU. If Texas wanted to be #1 they should have beat TTU. Nobody has a right to gripe.

Civil for BCS commish 2010!!

**rock_lobster** · 01-09-09, 01:19 PM

Originally Posted by Rage!

http://rivals.yahoo.com/ncaa/footbal...v=ap&type=lgns

what a crock of shit...Utah is ranked #2, come the fuck on...

discuss

Utah beats one legit team (with weeks of perparation), and all of a sudden they are better than USC, Texas, and Oklahoma? My fucking ass hole. No way Utah is better than those teams...no way.

Originally Posted by Consultant

Now go play USC.

That's what everybody wants to see.

This is always the case. I want to see USC play the title winner every year, but USC can remedy this themselves. STOP LOSING TO CRAP TEAMS IN YOUR WEAK CONFERENCE EVERY YEAR AND YOU WILL HAVE A SHOT.

I don't doubt USC's talent on the field, but because of the weakness of their conference, they must go undefeated (or have all SEC/big12 teams have 2 losses), to make it to the title game.

SEC, three in a row.

**Tractorpull** · 01-09-09, 02:11 PM

I still don't see why OU had to change their offense so much. You aren't going to win if you play hurry up but take as long as a damn huddle offense. If OU could have gotten into their rhythm it might have been a different ball game but thats Stoops for you.

Bob, you overthought your shit, and it cost you the game.....again for the fifth time in a row.

Maybe the Big 12 North will have some decent teams next year. Nebraska is supposed to be on the rebound and I can never count out Kansas. Texas A&M is also going to have a damn good team in a couple of years.

**CivilWars** · 01-09-09, 02:46 PM

Big 12 will probably be back to a 2 team conference next year, Texas and OU. Mizzou and TT will fall from grace with the loss of their QBs and top receivers. OSU will probably be average again. A&M is a year or more away at best. I think Kansas has just been average the last 2 years, but got lucky with a good schedule 2 years ago. The rest are mediocre at best, and awful at worst. Next year the Big 12 will probably be below the SEC, slightly ahead of the Pac 10 and Big 10, and well ahead of the ACC.