Results 1 to 9 of 9
Thread: here's a shocker
-
02-27-09, 10:28 AM #1
here's a shocker
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid will join Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) in opposing any effort to revive the 1994 assault weapons ban, putting them on the opposite side of the Obama administration.
Reid spokesman Jim Manley said the Nevada Democrat will preserve his traditional pro-gun rights voting record.
“Senator Reid would oppose an effort (to) reinstate the ban if the Senate were to vote on it in the future,” Manley told The Hill in an e-mail late Thursday night.
It was not immediately clear whether Reid would block the bill from the Senate, but his opposition casts serious doubt on its chances. Also, Manley noted that Reid voted against the ban in 1994 and again when it expired in 2004.
Reid’s stance joins him with Pelosi, who told reporters Thursday that the administration had not checked with her before Attorney General Eric Holder told reporters the administration would attempt to reinstate the ban. Pelosi gave a flat “no” when asked if she had spoken to Holder or any other administration officials about the issue.
“On that score, I think we need to enforce the laws we have right now,” Pelosi said at her weekly news conference. “I think it’s clear the Bush administration didn’t do that.”
Outside of the dig at the recent Republican president, that phrase is the stock line of those who don’t want to pass new gun control laws, such as the National Rifle Association.
I still think Nancy Pelosi is a vampire, but I think she might be on our side
-
02-27-09, 10:41 AM #2
Re: here's a shocker
Originally Posted by Flea
A number of House Democrats lost their seats after being targeted by the National Rifle Association for voting for the 1994 ban.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
03-01-09, 08:21 PM #9
Re: here's a shocker
Originally Posted by ninja|oaklandr
almost all of them absolutely despise Obama
(this is an analogy to represent the buisness aspect, not the politics or logic, so do not quote this you skanks) --think of it as the governement requiring vegetarian diet for all people, McDonalds would make huge amounts due to the influx of demand, but after it passed they would all sit around twiddling their thumbs like, "DURRRHHH what do we do now?" "ohh i know! lets start smuggling meat in and selling it the the deviants who still want to eat it!"
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks