Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 15 of 15

Thread: Supreme Court takes case regarding commercial free speech rights

  1. Registered TeamPlayer rock_lobster's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-05-06
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    11,412
    Post Thanks / Like
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: dcrews85
    #11

    Re: Supreme Court takes case regarding commercial free speech rights

    Quote Originally Posted by hawgballs
    My take is that corporations should not be considered as individual citizens, and shouldn't be afforded rights equal to individual citizens.

    Not saying I agree or disagree, but what would you have them be? And who is held accountable for the actions of said corporation, should a problem arise?

  2. Registered TeamPlayer Red_Lizard2's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-28-07
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    13,490
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    5
    Stat Links

    Supreme Court takes case regarding commercial free speech rights
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: theredlizard2
    #12

    Re: Supreme Court takes case regarding commercial free speech rights

    Quote Originally Posted by MotoZ
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruukil
    People have free speech, they also have to be held accountable for what they say. The same can be said for corporations.
    That's the brain dead way out of the issue. In the math world your answer might be labeled a "degenerative solution", e.g. 1=1

    A corporation is not a person.

    How is a corporation "held accountable"? Furthermore, once "held accountable", how can our laws prevent the corporation's bad action from happening again?
    not exactly pertaining to the question but the talk about corporations and political speech made me think of this quote (my have seen it in my TBTF thread)

    The US political system is already largely an owned-and-operated subisidiary of corporate America. When companies become as large as AIG or GM or Bank of America, they also gain a disproportionate influence over the political apparatus that is an order of magnitude larger than their share of the national GDP. It's not just that they have limitless money to donate to political campaigns. They also, by their size, are able to dispense political favors in virtually every congressional district, and also to threaten national havoc if they don't get their way.

  3. Registered TeamPlayer Blakeman's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-06-08
    Posts
    6,283
    Post Thanks / Like
    #13

    Re: Supreme Court takes case regarding commercial free speech rights

    Quote Originally Posted by MotoZ
    Quote Originally Posted by Ruukil
    People have free speech, they also have to be held accountable for what they say. The same can be said for corporations.
    That's the brain dead way out of the issue. In the math world your answer might be labeled a "degenerative solution", e.g. 1=1

    A corporation is not a person.

    How is a corporation "held accountable"? Furthermore, once "held accountable", how can our laws prevent the corporation's bad action from happening again?
    It is a hard thing, since a corporation can represent or maintain the livelihoods of citizens themselves. We can't lump all corporations into the 'evil empire' pile, but we do have to realize that a corporation as a whole shouldn't have the same rights as the individual person in court.

    Personally I think that there should be a strong definition of what is opinion based and what is factual information in regards to news media. As far as elections are concerned though, I think that advertisements have gotten too grossly overdone and it is more american idol than it is American Democracy.

    It will be interesting to see how this plays out, I just hope that as individuals our rights are maintained and not changed in ways we might not even foresee in the immediate future.

  4. Exiled
    Join Date
    05-06-07
    Posts
    6,036
    Post Thanks / Like
    #14

    Re: Supreme Court takes case regarding commercial free speech rights

    Quote Originally Posted by rock_lobster
    Quote Originally Posted by hawgballs
    My take is that corporations should not be considered as individual citizens, and shouldn't be afforded rights equal to individual citizens.

    Not saying I agree or disagree, but what would you have them be? And who is held accountable for the actions of said corporation, should a problem arise?
    They would be corporations, and just that, a legal entity separate from the persons that form it. They ought not have any type of personhood, in terms of constitutional rights. Who is held responsible now? Apparently not anyone. I would like to think that the corporate board members ought to be held legally liable for their corporation's actions, and shareholders ought to be held financially liable. I think corporation's abuse the individuals citizen's "right to petition government" ought to be curbed. I would like to see their rights to bankruptcy protection ought to be deeply limited, Owens-Corning is a good example.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Owens-Corning
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_petition
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_personhood

  5. Registered TeamPlayer rock_lobster's Avatar
    Join Date
    01-05-06
    Location
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Posts
    11,412
    Post Thanks / Like
    Gamer IDs

    PSN ID: dcrews85
    #15

    Re: Supreme Court takes case regarding commercial free speech rights

    Hmmm...I guess I can go with that. I dunno if I'd go as far as to hold each and every shareholder responsible for certain actions, but that's just a personal opinion. I do, think that members of the executive committee and/or the board members should, from now on, be held responsible for any illegal doings.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Title