Thread: Van Jones Resigns

Originally Posted by hawgballs

Originally Posted by CivilWars

Originally Posted by JurrasicKlaus

Hawg, clearly you are the biggest asshole around. Been banned lately?

While I don't have a problem with a little banter back and forth when TTP policy becomes part of the joke I start to miss the humor. I have banned others for poking fun at people being banned. I hope you don't have to be the next.

It's alright Civil. That is the cleverest thing that he could come up with......... I'm kind of embarrassed for him.

The cleverest thing you have is noting that others are clever?

On point though, what do you think about the 'czars' hawg? I thought the different secretaries were supposed to cover the different fields and advise the president?

Do you think that Van Jone's background is made up? Do you feel he is a 'good guy' to have around Washington?

Originally Posted by hawgballs

Originally Posted by Blakeman

Originally Posted by hawgballs

Originally Posted by CivilWars

Originally Posted by JurrasicKlaus

Hawg, clearly you are the biggest asshole around. Been banned lately?

While I don't have a problem with a little banter back and forth when TTP policy becomes part of the joke I start to miss the humor. I have banned others for poking fun at people being banned. I hope you don't have to be the next.

It's alright Civil. That is the cleverest thing that he could come up with......... I'm kind of embarrassed for him.

The cleverest thing you have is noting that others are clever?

On point though, what do you think about the 'czars' hawg? I thought the different secretaries were supposed to cover the different fields and advise the president?

Do you think that Van Jone's background is made up? Do you feel he is a 'good guy' to have around Washington?

Well what exactly did he do wrong except believe that Bush had something to do with the 9/11 attacks?(which I think the theory is ludicrous). How would Van Jones be a "bad guy" to have around Washington? I think his environmental initiatives aren't bad at all. So you tell me, why would he be such a "bad guy" to have around? Enlighten me, if you will.

Nice redirect hawg, but I never said he was a 'bad guy' only asked what made him a good guy and why we need these so called czars in the first place. Although Obama isnt the first to have them (Nixon had one or more) he has had the most. Why do this instead of actually making a new secretary for the position? Why do we fund these folks with our tax dollars when it circumvents the processes we have in place?

Back to my original question, what makes Van Jones a 'good guy' to have around? Where is his resume on being good with environmental matters outside of being in political groups?