Results 1 to 5 of 5
Thread: Why does RAM have to be so complicated?
-
01-05-12, 06:50 PM #1
Why does RAM have to be so complicated?
I have an AMD system and need a serious memory upgrade. What should I be looking for in memory?
I plan on upgrading my Mobo as well in the future... But Ram is needed more right now
InformationOperating System
MS Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit SP1
CPU
AMD Phenom II X4 965
RAM
4.0GB Single-Channel DDR3 @ 669MHz (9-9-9-24)
Motherboard
Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. GA-MA790XT-UD4P (Socket M2)
Graphics
L226W @ 1680x1050
AMD Radeon HD 6950 Series
-
01-05-12, 07:01 PM #2
Re: Why does RAM have to be so complicated?
are you asking what type of memory you need? than its DDR3 1666(O.C.)/1333/1066 MHz
list of ram that you can use for you motherboard
http://download.gigabyte.us/FileList...790xt-ud4p.pdf
you can go up to 16 gbLast edited by sM0Ke; 01-05-12 at 07:02 PM.
-
01-05-12, 07:26 PM #3
Re: Why does RAM have to be so complicated?
nice info sMOKe
What about 2+ channels? would my mobo not recognize them or is that irrelevant without hyper-threading?
without getting too complicated what are good timings/clocks for memory... or should I pick out a new Mobo first
-
- Join Date
- 10-28-07
- Location
- Richardson, TX
- Posts
- 17,410
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 3
01-06-12, 07:40 AM #4Re: Why does RAM have to be so complicated?
You really don't need to worry about timing too much. In most cases faster timing will only result in a percentage point or two of performance gain. If you are planning on overclocking, you will likely want to get RAM rated at a faster speed than you're running now.
As far a dual channel... most likely your RAM slots will be color-coded. Two slots one color and two the other. It just allows the CPU to increase the bandwidth by splitting up memory access between the 2 channels. Doesn't require hyperthreading.Last edited by WileECyte; 01-06-12 at 07:42 AM.
Too Much Damage liked this post
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks