Results 1 to 10 of 15
Thread: waterfox
-
-
- Join Date
- 05-28-07
- Location
- East Texas
- Posts
- 7,960
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 9
-
-
- Join Date
- 01-15-06
- Location
- Tampa, FL
- Posts
- 9,270
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 5
08-14-12, 08:10 AM #4Re: waterfox
Looks interesting. I am one of the few that still love some Firefox. Chrome is for the birds. Unfortunately the masses prefer that which is for the birds.
-
-
- Join Date
- 02-13-07
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX
- Posts
- 42,785
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 5
-
-
08-14-12, 01:17 PM #8
Re: waterfox
If you're happy with what you've got then there's no reason to switch... but FYI, the last year of FireFox iterations have dramatically improved performance and reduced memory/crash problems for me (64-bit GNU/linux).
If it wasn't for a few plugins and extensions that I use all the time, I would likely have switched too.
Æ
-
- Join Date
- 02-13-07
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX
- Posts
- 42,785
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 5
08-14-12, 01:20 PM #9waterfox
I think that is what my FF friends tell me every year. I have tried going back to FF multiple times for one or two certain plugins that weren't available on Chrome at the time, and could never full use it for more than a month without having to uninstall/reinstall because it got so slow. I finally got to the point where I couldn't justify keeping it installed for 1 or 2 plugins as the rest were developed for Chrome anyway.
Sent from my UrMoms using Tapatalk
-
08-14-12, 01:46 PM #10
Re: waterfox
That's pretty funny.
The whole point of the Mozilla project was to preserve choice (and improve browsers generally), and they've certainly done that. They kept the door open for other browsers, which is what we've got.
So if you're happy with what you're using, there's no reason to switch.
Cheers,
AetheLove
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks