Page 5 of 10 FirstFirst 12345678910 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 92

Thread: AMD phenom quad cores....

  1. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    01-13-08
    Posts
    179
    Post Thanks / Like
    #41

    Re: AMD phenom quad cores....

    Current Phenoms suck horribly and are all affected by the TLB (transition lookaside buffer) erratum.

    You can look up further details on this, but basically they are all buggy (most CPUs have erratum, or instances under which the CPU will not behave normally). What's different about this one is that it's not incredibly obscure, like slowdowns when performing a specific instruction set right after another specific instrction set within a particular application environment, and so AMD has released a BIOS-level workaround to basically throttle down the CPU to avoid the erratum. That means you lose a fair bit of speed on top of the poor overclocking performance.

    This erratum is addressed in the new steppings of Phenom, according to AMD, but all currently available CPUs are affected.

    For more info, including what the TLB erratum actually is and the performance impact you get from the workaround, look

    http://techreport.com/articles.x/13741 http://www.nordichardware.com/news,7104.html

  2. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    02-03-08
    Posts
    10
    Post Thanks / Like
    #42

    Re: AMD phenom quad cores....

    Exactly.

    Now, this is a general statement that I usually tell everyone.

    Yes, clock for clock, a Phenom will beat a Core 2 proc. But when you have people doing 100%+ overclocks on budget binned chips, you have to wonder.

    For instance, E2140 taken to 3ghz from 1.6ghz. $80 proc.

    Like I said, I have an AMD from when they were on top, but let's face it. Fanboyism is the downfall of everything fair and well in this world.

    BigDog, I think some of the people behind you are tools. No offense, and I mean you know how to build a computer, but so does my 7yo sister. I just think that sometimes your fanboyism gets in the way of true bang for your buck. I think that people should solely buy a motherboard that they can overclock with (Intel X38/P35 anyone?) and overclock the hell out of anything they buy. If you are going to overclock, chances are you won't NEED the processor for 10 years and then some.

    *sigh*

  3. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    11-27-07
    Posts
    308
    Post Thanks / Like
    #43

    Re: AMD phenom quad cores....

    Bleh i just posted a response to the last couple of threads.

    Ill sum it all up. The phenom had problems that have been solved and current production are bug free.
    Lots of products have had bugs along those lines and get blown up when a bored website needs something to post to get some hits.

    I belive that big dog was pointing out that the phenom was a good buy.
    Some people OC some dont. Not my thing As an administrator for a data center that procs 8 million customers bills a night...
    OC means nothing to me. But I really like reading articles by people who do overclock. As they are pushing the limits that chip makers must cater too or be left behind on the geeks sites.

    quick question what do you all think about the e8500 from intel. I sorta like it.

  4. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    01-13-08
    Posts
    179
    Post Thanks / Like
    #44

    Re: AMD phenom quad cores....

    The new e8*** series chips are amazing.. smaller architecture less power and less heat? and they scale like crazy .. just look at the speeds people are getting out of them.. note how many are on just air cooling
    http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...splay.php?f=56

  5. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    02-03-08
    Posts
    10
    Post Thanks / Like
    #45

    Re: AMD phenom quad cores....

    The E8xxx series is amazing, not uncommon for 4.5+ghz on air. I'll be building new this summer so I can't wait for AMD to bring something out and spank Intel like the old days!!!

  6. Registered TeamPlayer investigater's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-07-07
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    4,289
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    AMD phenom quad cores.... AMD phenom quad cores.... AMD phenom quad cores.... AMD phenom quad cores.... AMD phenom quad cores....
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: investigater PSN ID: investigater-5th Steam ID: investigater investigater's Originid: investigater
    #46

    Re: AMD phenom quad cores....

    With all this talk about over clocking, what do i need to do to mine to get the most out of it? I have a p35 MOBO also. Stock fan cooler. What would be a good limit on the voltage for this as well?


  7. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    01-13-08
    Posts
    179
    Post Thanks / Like
    #47

    Re: AMD phenom quad cores....

    heh.. your not even running at 3.0ghz which is your stock speed for that cpu. You are at 2.0ghz 333x6 = 1998 which is roughly 2.0ghz ... your multi should be 9 not 6 ... 6x333 = 2997 mhz.. up your multi for starters to get your cpu to what it should be stock.

    Its probably Intels speed stepping kicking it.. Look for that and disable it in your bios. Then we can go from there. Then read through this
    http://www.blazingpc.com/forum/showt...985/index.html

  8. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    02-03-08
    Posts
    10
    Post Thanks / Like
    #48

    Re: AMD phenom quad cores....

    Thank your SFG you beat me to the punch. That is a GREAT FAQ which will not lead you astray.

    Basics:

    Upping your FSB which controls EVERYTHING. You up your FSB, your mem and CPU goes up, which usually requires dropping the memory onto a divider.

  9. Registered TeamPlayer SapiensErus's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-22-07
    Posts
    8,917
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    4
    #49

    Re: AMD phenom quad cores....

    Quote Originally Posted by standard235
    BigDog, I think some of the people behind you are tools. No offense, and I mean you know how to build a computer, but so does my 7yo sister.
    That is a ridiculous comparison. I have helped countless people, who are very, very smart, build computers because they dont know how. It is easy for people like, me, you, Big, and apparently your sister because we taught ourselves about it or took classes or both and have an interest in learning the ins and outs of building a computer.

    I have never worked on a car, but maybe I should go try to custom tune my roomates Mustang for performance?

    Quote Originally Posted by standard235
    I just think that sometimes your fanboyism gets in the way of true bang for your buck.
    Have you read many of the posts in this hardware forum? I noted that you made your account only yesterday, and are in agreement with SFG (who, like me, you, and Big, are very knowledgable about system building) and seem to be responding to discussions he was in; pals maybe? But you might want to note that the moderators, users, and Big himself have pretty much been soldily recommending Intel since the release of the Core 2. Fanboyism? I have no idea which side of the fence Big is on in the processor world, and I have read countless posts about hardware from him. Big is pragmatic to the point of making me sick sometimes! Fanboy? pshhh...


    Quote Originally Posted by standard235
    I think that people should solely buy a motherboard that they can overclock with (Intel X38/P35 anyone?) and overclock the hell out of anything they buy.
    Complete rubbish. My brother can build and fly Black Hawk helicopters but has no idea whats going on inside his computer. I had to build it for him. If it were OCed he would have voided warranties, reduced component lifespan, and the potential for immediate breakage. But he has no idea how to monitor his temps, adjust his voltage, etc.

    There is a lot of technical knowledge going into correctly overclocking a computer; most people dont want to learn that. People want to turn on the computer, play the game, surf the net, watch the DVD, then go to bed, and never even think of what is going on inside the black box.

    Quote Originally Posted by standard235
    If you are going to overclock, chances are you won't NEED the processor for 10 years and then some.
    That is the only thing you have said in this message I agree with. But on that note, processors lifespans arent usually rated at 10 years are they? I thought it was 5. And OCing can reduce that. I know plenty of people who have used procs for 5 or more years for gaming.

    Quote Originally Posted by standard235
    *sigh*
    Point?



    My stock AMD 5600+ with 8800 GTS 640s plays every game out there beautifully and cranks out 10700+ 3dmarks. Zero risk because it is all stock: if something breaks, it is subject to warranty.

    On that note, I do like to OC for fun, and see what kind of benchmarks I can get. But if I aint gettin' the jaggies with settings jacked all the way up, why even risk it? I don't run at OC because I don't need to. In the end, I am not saying "you are an idiot for overclocking" or "AMD is better than Intel." I am stating that OCing is unnecessary due to the risk and associated benefits.

    When I help someone spec out a system, I try to get them bang for the buck without violating warranty. That usually means a Core 2 and an 8800 GT right now. And I am an AMD fanboy. I dont know what Big is a fanboy of, probably whatever is a good deal at the moment, but he focuses on bang for the buck instead of assuming everyone who wants a computer is also wanting to geek out on OCing.


    BTW, you guys should link your 3dmark comparisons. If you click the links in our profiles here you can see many of us have.


  10. Registered TeamPlayer investigater's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-07-07
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    4,289
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    AMD phenom quad cores.... AMD phenom quad cores.... AMD phenom quad cores.... AMD phenom quad cores.... AMD phenom quad cores....
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: investigater PSN ID: investigater-5th Steam ID: investigater investigater's Originid: investigater
    #50

    Re: AMD phenom quad cores....

    I would post my 3dmarks but they are shit. I bomb on the processor test and i do not know why. I am close to the lowestr score for same rig built and it drives me nuts to not know why it does this.

    I have an e6850 3.0, nvidia 8600gt that is slightly OC, 3 gigs of ballistics ddr2 800mhz ram, 650 w power supply, p35 gigabyte MoBo with windows vista home 64. I get shit for scores in 3dmark but i can play crysis, 2142, world in conflict, cod4, whatever i throw at it, it can play with all settings on high with high FPS and no jaggies or particals.

    I have however noticed recently after playing 2142 for about 2 or more hrs that the ground and some buildings will turn yellow. Hard to explain but i think it is due to over heating the gpu, which this only happens every once in awhile. I turned off the lighting inhanced option in 2142 and it seemed to fix it. Sometimes also the screen tends to get a little darker than normal and sometimes LOS gets a little less than what it was when i first stated playing that night.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Title