Results 21 to 25 of 25
Thread: HardOCP Article on Canned benchmarks VS actual gameplay
-
02-12-08, 04:12 PM #21
Re: HardOCP Article on Canned benchmarks VS actual gameplay
I really like to use the charts at Toms, then go read newegg reviews. The charts at Toms rock the house.. although I usually skip the 3dmark chart and just look at the game related charts...
But yeah; Toms charts are the shizzle.
-
-
02-12-08, 04:21 PM #23
Re: HardOCP Article on Canned benchmarks VS actual gameplay
Originally Posted by MaKe_OuT_33
We'll see.
-
02-14-08, 05:27 AM #24
Re: HardOCP Article on Canned benchmarks VS actual gameplay
Before I drop $300+ on a card, I'd like to know what I'm spending my money on. I'll look at the canned reports and Hardocp. It's good to know the relative power from the canned reports but also what you can expect (if you have the exact same game as the benchies) from the Hardocp reports. Knowing what resolutions are "playable" are good. If you try to bump it beyond these and you don't like the framerate/gameplay, you've got an idea why.
That being said, the new 512 MB versions with the G92 chip from Nvidia seem to be kick butt! The 1 GB version seems to be a waste of 512 MB which is interesting.
-
togboilKHotGuest11-18-10, 04:07 AM #25
RBL Checker Match - togboilKHot from 93.174.93.199
ALERT!
Someone has tried to register using the IP Address 93.174.93.199 which is MATCHED IN THE RBL DATABASE of the dnsbl.ahbl.org RBL.
This registration attempt has been allowed and the account has been permanently banned.
Registration Details: togboilKHot ( melvakeating@gmail.com )
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks