Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: AMD? Intel counterpart?

  1. Registered TeamPlayer CivilWars's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-13-07
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    42,785
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    5
    Stat Links

    AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart?
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: CivilWars CivilWars's Originid: CivilWars
    #21

    Re: AMD? Intel counterpart?

    I have no problem with you wanting to use Linux. I am just tired of people that don't have Vista, and some who have never had Vista, bitching about it just because it is Vista, and is a Microsoft product. It's your computer, so I could care less what you put on it, I am just sick of hearing about how those of us that have Vista, and get it to work flawlessly are somehow inferior.

    Rant of, back to finding you a laptop.


  2. Registered TeamPlayer JBMCW2010's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-19-07
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    10,099
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    5
    Stat Links

    AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart?
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: JBMCW2010 Steam ID: JBMCW2010
    #22

    Re: AMD? Intel counterpart?

    Quote Originally Posted by CivilWars
    I have no problem with you wanting to use Linux. I am just tired of people that don't have Vista, and some who have never had Vista, bitching about it just because it is Vista, and is a Microsoft product. It's your computer, so I could care less what you put on it, I am just sick of hearing about how those of us that have Vista, and get it to work flawlessly are somehow inferior.

    Rant of, back to finding you a laptop.
    I have used Vista before. It never worked well enough for me to be happy. Games wouldn't run programs wouldn't perform as well in it.


  3. Registered TeamPlayer WileECyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-28-07
    Location
    Richardson, TX
    Posts
    17,410
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    3
    Stat Links

    AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart?
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: wileecyte WileECyte's Originid: WileECyte
    #23

    Re: AMD? Intel counterpart?

    Quote Originally Posted by JBMCW2010
    I have used Vista before. It never worked well enough for me to be happy. Games wouldn't run programs wouldn't perform as well in it.
    How long has it been though? I've not found anything that wouldn't run on Vista at this point. Lots has changed in a year since the retail launch.

  4. Registered TeamPlayer JBMCW2010's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-19-07
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    10,099
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    5
    Stat Links

    AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart?
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: JBMCW2010 Steam ID: JBMCW2010
    #24

    Re: AMD? Intel counterpart?

    um, I left Vista in September/August time frame.


  5. Registered TeamPlayer WileECyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-28-07
    Location
    Richardson, TX
    Posts
    17,410
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    3
    Stat Links

    AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart? AMD? Intel counterpart?
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: wileecyte WileECyte's Originid: WileECyte
    #25

    Re: AMD? Intel counterpart?

    Lots has changed since Aug/Sept of 07... A lot of major hotfixes came out in that timeframe to address compatibility issues. I couldn't play 2142 or BF2 for more than a round or two before it crashed with memory errors. If it wasn't the memory errors, it was my hunk-o-crap Creative card having driver issues. The hotfixes were applied and I dumped Creative for good and now I have very few problems.

  6. Rob Zombie
    Join Date
    04-26-09
    Posts
    645
    Post Thanks / Like
    #26

    Don't Study the Video Game, Study the Gamer

    rrossman2 writes with this quote from a USA Today article about research recently presented to the American Psychological Association: "Video games — especially violent ones — are constantly under scrutiny from parents concerned about negative effects. Now, research suggests that those worries should focus more on the player's personality rather than the content of the games. 'If you're worried about a video game turning your son or daughter into a killer, don't worry about that,' says psychologist Patrick Markey of Villanova (Pa.) University. 'But is your kid moody, impulsive, or are they unfriendly? It's probably not the best idea to have that child play violent video games.' ... Markey found slight increases in hostility for those with certain personality traits: extremely high on neuroticism and extremely low on agreeableness and conscientiousness. ... 'We found — irrespective of violent content — the two highly competitive games produced more aggressive behavior than the two less competitive games,' [Markey said.]"

    Read more of this story at Slashdot.





Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Title