LOL where did you find that vid the nvdia fan club?
The card is nice but all these people that do the reviews need to change the 3dmark from stock to real in game settings.
1920x1200
8x16x
Ultra textures.
Slap that into 3dmark and the scores changes big time. Also dont the nvidia cards get bonus 3dmark points for PhysX?
Thing is we have seen reviews on that and only game that takes advantage is Unreal 3 and its like 15 extra fps.
Good card but overkill.
Here is a article we will both love.
GTX 295 review vs. 4870X2 + Quad SLI / Xfire
http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/gra...-sli-review/18
Rounding up
Having now spent a lot more time with the Nvidia GeForce GTX 295, we can make some more complete conclusions about its existence and position in the market against the AMD ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2. In short, it’s the fastest graphics card on the planet as of today, but that title isn’t undisputed.
When AMD launched the Radeon HD 4870 X2, it was pretty much an undisputed champion with only one game showing the GeForce GTX 280 as a match for AMD’s dual-GPU behemoth. With the GeForce GTX 295, we were never going to see those kinds of performance advances – but then neither did we expect them – because the GTX 295 is about redressing the balance. It’s two GPUs vs. two GPUs again, skin on skin, in a fight to the death and, frankly speaking, Nvidia wins that battle by a nose.
It’s significantly faster in a number of titles and there are only a few scenarios where the GeForce GTX 295 is slower – only one of those is what we would call a battering and that’s in Fallout 3 at 2,560 x 1,600. That is, of course, down to the fact that the GT200b GPUs become bandwidth starved at high resolutions with high anti-aliasing enabled.
Back and forth like always.
ATI won last round by a cold knockout and this time nvidia sneaked a sucker punch in ftw and the next ati will......and then......and then......
Goes on and on.
Bookmarks