Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 13 of 13

Thread: Wireless issue

  1. Registered TeamPlayer WileECyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-28-07
    Location
    Richardson, TX
    Posts
    17,410
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    3
    Stat Links

    Wireless issue Wireless issue Wireless issue Wireless issue Wireless issue Wireless issue
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: wileecyte WileECyte's Originid: WileECyte
    #11

    Re: Wireless issue

    I prefer Acronis True Image to any of the alternatives. Just upgraded to 2010 the other day.

  2. Registered TeamPlayer Viktor_Olin's Avatar
    Join Date
    05-15-07
    Location
    SC
    Posts
    3,048
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    Wireless issue Wireless issue Wireless issue
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: Viktor_Olin
    #12

    Re: Wireless issue

    Laggy, if you just want to image your laptop, check out Macrium Reflect Free; very nice freeware that is remarkably fast and efficient. I have a 650 GB hard drive with about 150 GB used, and Macrium images it into a 37 GB file. It takes about 12 minutes start to finish writing to an internal drive, and about 30 minutes writing to an external USB drive.
    http://www.macrium.com/reflectfree.asp
    "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed."
    The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution

  3. Registered TeamPlayer Braddoc's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-04-07
    Posts
    1,257
    Post Thanks / Like
    #13

    Re: Wireless issue

    on a side note, laggy, you are correct to change the 169.254.x.x/16 address scheme from the device. this is an IANA reserved address block for a "link local" interface. it's the ip address scheme you see when a DHCP client has a good media connection, and failed to receive an IP address from a DHCP server. it's to allow you to communicate directly to another pc on the same physical network segment in the case of a logical network segment failure (can't obtain an IP address). it is, by it's nature, not supposed to be routable. however, behind a NAT device (such as a firewall/router), you can make it routable.

    it's the same theory behind the IPv6 autoconfiguration IP address (the IP address that you always see on a host with IPv6 enabled, but no IPv6 capable routers configured). the difference is that IPv6 was designed to be able to have many IP addresses at the same time, where IPv4 put it in as an afterthought. since most IPv4 users only see/use that IP scheme in the event that DHCP fails, most see it as a bad thing.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Title