Kicked from PR Server: Kozelsk 12:30EST (-5:00GMT)

**Atrovenator** · 07-09-09, 10:26 PM

Oh no, it's quite alright. Texas Teamplayers requires all players to charge headlong into battle without thought for tactics or strategy (definitions of which may be found in Cal von Clausewitz's 'On War' which is quoted additionally in my signature.) Texas Teamplayers requires all players to kowtow to arrogant clanmembers who have already lost APCs and been wiped out twice in failed assaults, who do not provide their team with intel and simply demand assets they feel they are entitled to because they are so awesome. Texas Teamplayers encourages admins to FORCE players to adopt THEIR strategy by kicking non-compliant members without ever establishing an official position. Texas Teamplayers admins and members are unwilling to join squads, but would rather lose 3 productive players forever than gun in a tank for one hour. Texas Teamplayers admins are further unwilling to STEP THE FUCK UP and GO COMMANDER in order to see that assets are applied to their own personal specifications or the specifications of individuals whose cocks they may or may not be smoking. I've had it with you, I've had it with this community. If you can honestly and with a straight face defend the action of kicking someone who is TRYING AS HARD AS POSSIBLE TO BE PRODUCTIVE WITHOUT COMPROMISING PERSONAL STRATEGY WHICH IS A SQUADLEADER'S PREROGATIVE, then I can honestly say that Texas Teamplayers (at least on the PR SERVER) is no longer about that. All hail the eternal rule of Texas Dictators!

I won't be back. Goodbye. It was nice knowing the lot of you. Come find me on a real server that doesn't approve of knee-jerk admin decisions over tactics and strategy related issues, or overlook obvious facts in defending flawed and unfair logic. Taking off a chopper and crashing it because you don't know how to fly is wasting an asset. Sitting in a tank until you can crew it THE WAY IT WAS INTENDED (especially on a map as dense and difficult to 'tank' on as Kozelsk is not wasting it. Rather, it is waiting until the precise moment WHEN THE INDIVIDUAL IN CHARGE OF COMMANDING THE ASSET DETERMINES IT IS SAGACIOUS TO MOVE.

But anyhow, I've said my bit, goodbye, good riddance.

**Wraith** · 07-10-09, 12:00 AM

Personally, I think it would have greatly helped your case had you and your squadmates not returned to the server merely to argue the decisions and slander the admins.

I personally think Bravo was very frustrated at the time (I sure was), and the situation was very confusing. Sequence of events:

1. Owen[AUS] grabs the log truck. Bravo hops in the passenger seat. When Bravo refusees to get out of the truck, MajorT0m TKs Bravo and wastes the log truck.

2. Moving out with an APC, our (Bravo's squad, I was the medic) squad is ambushed, and several of us go down, including me. Bravo grabs my medic kit but cannot revive me because my body has glitched into the wreck of the APC. We spend the next five minutes attempting to sort out the issues with kits, finally eventually getting Bravo back as officer and me back as medic.

3. Several people (mostly FDN, I admit) begin complaining about the lack of armor support. Atro's squad has sat in base for the entire game so far.

4. Bravo kicks squad 3 (Armor Squad) because he judges they are just dicking around in the base with all the tanks.

5. FDN and Bravo's squads grab the tanks and move out.

6. Atro, Fight, and gwbush return to the server and begin arguing the admin's decision. Bravo is distracted from squad leading in order to do admin actions responding to the argument. As a result, the infantry and Bravo's tank are confused as hell. I sure was.

7. Squad 3 quits the game after a couple more minutes of arguing. Bravo quits the game (likely) out of frustration. The rest of Bravo's squad (myself included) quit the game out of boredom.

**11Bravo** · 07-10-09, 01:56 PM

Just for clarification purposes; I was attempting to run an infantry squad, which is my normal mode of play on the server Atro. I had no desire to have the fucking armor, could care less who operates it so long as someone mans up and uses it to help the team and not just their own Ideals/Squad plans. This is a team play based server. At the point Palerider took the tank was because no one was even trying to use it. It was still sitting there useless. So for you to even accuse me of doing something wrong, maybe you had better know the whole damned story and not just your own fucking perspective. What I have seen on the server, is little bitches for armor/helicopters/jets who don't care to do anything but play with their little toys. Who are worthless at being infantry. I have also noticed that where assets are concerned people's judgement is often about personal gameplay and not that of a team. One final note, it has been stated before in the PR forums; Named Squads don't determine assets, Commanders don't assign assets, however they can respectfully request that someone relinquish the asset to another squad, but commanders don't determine who gets the toys. Your premise is that I willingly had you kicked so we could use it or someone I favor could have the armor. If you even once played on the server as religiously as you say, you would know for a fact, that I don't play or admin that way. So, I'm left with the knowledge that you are same little armor bitch you were when you left this community before. Is that about right?

**w4jchosen** · 07-10-09, 05:16 PM

Originally Posted by Atrovenator

Oh no, it's quite alright. Texas Teamplayers requires all players to charge headlong into battle without thought for tactics or strategy (definitions of which may be found in Cal von Clausewitz's 'On War' which is quoted additionally in my signature.) Texas Teamplayers requires all players to kowtow to arrogant clanmembers who have already lost APCs and been wiped out twice in failed assaults, who do not provide their team with intel and simply demand assets they feel they are entitled to because they are so awesome. Texas Teamplayers encourages admins to FORCE players to adopt THEIR strategy by kicking non-compliant members without ever establishing an official position. Texas Teamplayers admins and members are unwilling to join squads, but would rather lose 3 productive players forever than gun in a tank for one hour. Texas Teamplayers admins are further unwilling to STEP THE FUCK UP and GO COMMANDER in order to see that assets are applied to their own personal specifications or the specifications of individuals whose cocks they may or may not be smoking. I've had it with you, I've had it with this community. If you can honestly and with a straight face defend the action of kicking someone who is TRYING AS HARD AS POSSIBLE TO BE PRODUCTIVE WITHOUT COMPROMISING PERSONAL STRATEGY WHICH IS A SQUADLEADER'S PREROGATIVE, then I can honestly say that Texas Teamplayers (at least on the PR SERVER) is no longer about that. All hail the eternal rule of Texas Dictators!

I won't be back. Goodbye. It was nice knowing the lot of you. Come find me on a real server that doesn't approve of knee-jerk admin decisions over tactics and strategy related issues, or overlook obvious facts in defending flawed and unfair logic. Taking off a chopper and crashing it because you don't know how to fly is wasting an asset. Sitting in a tank until you can crew it THE WAY IT WAS INTENDED (especially on a map as dense and difficult to 'tank' on as Kozelsk is not wasting it. Rather, it is waiting until the precise moment WHEN THE INDIVIDUAL IN CHARGE OF COMMANDING THE ASSET DETERMINES IT IS SAGACIOUS TO MOVE.

But anyhow, I've said my bit, goodbye, good riddance.

Piss off. Since you won't be coming back, I'll make sure of that. Locked