Results 1 to 10 of 12
Thread: Coming soon - The "Sig of Shame ! ! !"
-
05-02-08, 12:49 PM #1Coming soon - The "Sig of Shame ! ! !"
There is a defined limit to the size of the signatures people are allowed to incorporate into postings at TTP. The entire sig should be no larger than 600 pixels wide and 150 pixels high. This also includes any quotes you may have above or below your graphic of choice. Each line of text is approximately 13 pixels on its own.
Trying to get people to conform has been met with haphazard results. We've tried guidelines, rules, policies, suggestions, PMs trying to get people to reduce the size of their sigs. Now that the summer is here and I have a bit more 'free time' I have decided I am going to 'help' people fix their sigs. In the very near future, if I see one that is incorrectly sized, I will simply substitute in an appropriately sized sig for you. It was very specially designed by one of our own admins to help convey the message.
The sizes were voted on in the past. If you don't like the current limitations, find the old thread and discuss it there. The current limitations were decided on to reduce the clutter and business of our boards and not make it look like a cheap MySpace page.
Fix your stuff or I'll help you.
-
-
- Join Date
- 09-08-06
- Location
- San Antonio, TX
- Posts
- 7,655
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 2
05-02-08, 12:53 PM #3Re: Coming soon - The "Sig of Shame ! ! !"
Oh, oh, is it going to be that pink banner that we saw used several months ago when we first implemented this rule? That was funny, especially because someone (I want to say Jello..) left it on there because he said he didn't mind the one given to him.
-
-
-
-
-
-
02-07-09, 12:34 AM #9
Re: Coming soon - The "Sig of Shame ! ! !"
Originally Posted by laggyNgroovy
ohhh
Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot.
-
- Join Date
- 11-13-07
- Location
- Plano, TX and Ruston, LA
- Posts
- 32,364
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 43
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks