Poor Server Performance and Decline

**CivilWars** · 03-29-11, 10:15 AM

Originally Posted by Bunni

right here: http://www.teamplayergaming.com/members/list/

All that tells me is how many members we have, and their basic info. It does not tell me that at the end of the TTP name we were drawing in X members a month, and now we draw Y. It does not tell me that at the end of TTP we were doing A page views a month and now we are doing B.

I was told that there were thousands of people just waiting to join our servers, but would not due to the word Texas, I simply want to know why they haven't promptly joined, at least from what I can tell, in the time since we changed the name?

Sent from my UrMoms using Tapatalk

**Walkerxes** · 03-29-11, 05:45 PM

Originally Posted by CivilWars

All that tells me is how many members we have, and their basic info. It does not tell me that at the end of the TTP name we were drawing in X members a month, and now we draw Y. It does not tell me that at the end of TTP we were doing A page views a month and now we are doing B.

I was told that there were thousands of people just waiting to join our servers, but would not due to the word Texas, I simply want to know why they haven't promptly joined, at least from what I can tell, in the time since we changed the name?

Sent from my UrMoms using Tapatalk

Oh look! A dead horse! let me get my stick.

**enf** · 03-29-11, 05:56 PM

A lot of assumptions being throw around as fact on both sides here...

**CivilWars** · 03-29-11, 06:18 PM

Originally Posted by Walkerxes

Oh look! A dead horse! let me get my stick.

Really? Because I haven't seen the argument since te change.

Sent from my UrMoms using Tapatalk

**Walkerxes** · 03-29-11, 07:13 PM

Originally Posted by CivilWars

Really? Because I haven't seen the argument since te change.

Sent from my UrMoms using Tapatalk

I saw all the argument before, and all the whining since. And as you've said, you don't necessarily suggest we go back. Ok, fine.. then exactly what is the purpose of your statements? Are you looking for validation? A way to be able to say "I told you so"? Would you actually be mollified if data showed that the name change actually did have a positive effect on both increased membership? or would you then turn and make the argument that it was more likely to do with the addition of new games like BC2 and MNC? ..or do you just like to prod the nest now and again? What purpose?

**DJ Ms. White** · 03-29-11, 07:19 PM

Civil, you do realize that we would have been forced to switch anyway due to TTP being comprised and flagged as an infected website right?

**CivilWars** · 03-29-11, 07:37 PM

Originally Posted by Walkerxes

I saw all the argument before, and all the whining since. And as you've said, you don't necessarily suggest we go back. Ok, fine.. then exactly what is the purpose of your statements? Are you looking for validation? A way to be able to say "I told you so"? Would you actually be mollified if data showed that the name change actually did have a positive effect on both increased membership? or would you then turn and make the argument that it was more likely to do with the addition of new games like BC2 and MNC? ..or do you just like to prod the nest now and again? What purpose?

The purpose is even in this topic it has been posted by others that the switch helped us, so like I am always asked when I make a claim where is the proof of that? If there is none then so be it, but stop saying it helped. If there is proof then it should be easy to document.

White, as to your assessment, that can be fixed.

Sent from my UrMoms using Tapatalk