Thread: Request for Unbanning

ive always had a problem with censorship, but after seeing this a few times on ripleys believe it or not, it began to strike a nerve. the FCC censors boobs and such. but on ripleys and discovery/discovery health and other such networks, they are not afraid to show anatomicly correct, very realistic looking modles of the human body, totally uncensored. whats the difference!?

Its because the US views a breast as something sexual. In Europe the breast is viewed as a thing of beauty (which it is!) and isnt really considered something overly sexual.

When it's real women, they have to consider the actual woman who is in the nude. Does she want her tits all over the air? Probably not. Just 'cause some people out there are in need of a good porn flick, doesn't mean the prducers can show a woman's breasts on TV.

If you really want to see some tits, just Google.

They also show nudes if it's considered "art".

Originally Posted by darkclone

When it's real women, they have to consider the actual woman who is in the nude. Does she want her tits all over the air? Probably not. Just 'cause some people out there are in need of a good porn flick, doesn't mean the prducers can show a woman's breasts on TV.

If you really want to see some tits, just Google.

well they obviously wouldnt care seeing as they are boobing us. its the FCC i have a problem with. and the censorship of howard stern. that really burned my up, because everybody knows howard is the god of radio.

Censorship is mostly wrong. I don't agree with my country's over censorship.

Censorship is just another excuse for lazy parents to not have to actually parent their kid. Instead of setting which channels they can watch, why not make all of them super-friendly, politically-correct, non-violent, and full of lovable Disney characters, eh?

:nope:

Censorship is fucking lame, if you ask me. And we laugh here quite often how the "peeps" and the boobs are blurred out, hell even g-strings who are showen through white pants are being blurred out.
I've seen this in England aswell to some extent. But nothing like America. It's sick!

Against the general tide, censorship is important, to a degree. I think that breasts are a very sensitive area that many parents would be embarassed if their child saw. It is up to the parent, not society, to teach children about such things. By that logic, censorship actually gives us more freedoms, not less.

Originally Posted by Fire Legion

Against the general tide, censorship is important, to a degree. I think that breasts are a very sensitive area that many parents would be embarassed if their child saw. It is up to the parent, not society, to teach children about such things. By that logic, censorship actually gives us more freedoms, not less.

But you also gotta remember the only way children were fed before the 1800's or 1900's was through breast feeding. Hell the other day i went to a resturant with my friends and saw a lady nurse her child at another table. Censorship is getting to outta hand