ARMA 3 - New and Improved

**CivilWars** · 06-17-14, 08:56 PM

Thanks to Kanati we have a new remote admin tool available that will allow remote access to change missions, and stop, start, and restart the server. What does this mean for you? It means we can now grant a select few people the ability to add mission files to the server, and change the active mission. We are looking for a few admins that are willing and able to take on this responsibility. If you have an interest reply here, and let us know.

**DJ Ms. White** · 06-17-14, 09:27 PM

--Not interested in Admining as hours should attest--
With that disclaimer out of the way, does that mean wasteland or vanilla Arma or...?

**CivilWars** · 06-17-14, 09:55 PM

Any mission that can be obtained and run on an ARMA 3 server I would assume.

**Blah64** · 06-17-14, 09:58 PM

That sounds awesome!
I would love a TPG server that doesn't run wasteland. (I found Wasteland to be boring)

**ElFuriosoGato** · 06-17-14, 11:17 PM

Anything but Wasteland.

**maximusboomus** · 06-18-14, 07:55 AM

Sounds like fun! I'd love to play a few rounds of battle royale with people!

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

**Kanati** · 06-18-14, 09:29 AM

Then we need people to step up and be "super-mid" admins that can modify the files on the server and remote-restart it when needed and organize changes to the mission files and get games up and running.

We have the software in place to allow it now so we just need butts in seats willing to do it.

**SmokenScion** · 06-18-14, 01:25 PM

Karts DM ftw!

**DAVID(GEN)** · 06-18-14, 04:39 PM

I'd be interested in being an admin for the server.

Also I think we really need to get in on King of the Hill. Last night I looked at the top populated servers and 3 of the top 5 were King of the Hill servers. Don't get me wrong Wasteland is cool and all but it seems like it is not the new big thing and there is an over abundance of servers; everyone and their brother has a Wasteland server. It does not make since to me for us to try and get back into Wasteland when there are over 50 Wasteland servers sitting empty, we would only get lost in the crowd. If you look at King of the Hill servers you can see that there on only 4 servers sitting empty at this moment (1500 mountain time) and there are only 25 King of the Hill servers almost all of them sitting easily at over half capacity. I would think that we would have more success getting server population by going with the King of the Hill game type.
**after looking at the King of the Hill server list I noticed that 3 of the 4 empty servers are CA 1, 2, and 3 which is weird because most of the time I see them easily over half full if not full.

This is the way that I think of it. We are looking to "sell" people slots on our server. So what kind of slot should we "sell"? Well we could try and "sell" a Wasteland slot but there are a few problems with that. One of those problems is that there are already an over abundance of slots available for Wasteland. The other problem is that Wasteland has been around long enough for people to know what "brand" slot they want to "buy".

So I think we should try and "sell" them a King of the Hill slot. This is why... King of the Hill is new and growing, to me it seems like it is doing what Wasteland did when it first came out and maybe one day might be bigger than Wasteland. Also out of all the King of the Hill slots that are available pretty much all of them are being used to a point that when trying to connect to a server there is a high likely hood that you would need a reservists slot to joint. I would think that means there are not enough King of the Hill server slots being produced. So why wouldn't we fill that demand?

As for running missions we could run the server as King of the Hill during the week then on the weekend run it as an event server. This is something that Talkos was talking about and I think he might be better as explaining than me.

Another thing that I noticed it that if I use "TPG" or "TeamPlayerGaming" as the filter I cannot find out server but yet gametracker says that the server in alive.

**Nuckle** · 06-18-14, 04:52 PM

Originally Posted by DAVID(GEN)

I'd be interested in being an admin for the server.

Also I think we really need to get in on King of the Hill. Last night I looked at the top populated servers and 3 of the top 5 were King of the Hill servers. Don't get me wrong Wasteland is cool and all but it seems like it is not the new big thing and there is an over abundance of servers; everyone and their brother has a Wasteland server. It does not make since to me for us to try and get back into Wasteland when there are over 50 Wasteland servers sitting empty, we would only get lost in the crowd. If you look at King of the Hill servers you can see that there on only 4 servers sitting empty at this moment (1500 mountain time) and there are only 25 King of the Hill servers almost all of them sitting easily at over half capacity. I would think that we would have more success getting server population by going with the King of the Hill game type.
**after looking at the King of the Hill server list I noticed that 3 of the 4 empty servers are CA 1, 2, and 3 which is weird because most of the time I see them easily over half full if not full.

This is the way that I think of it. We are looking to "sell" people slots on our server. So what kind of slot should we "sell"? Well we could try and "sell" a Wasteland slot but there are a few problems with that. One of those problems is that there are already an over abundance of slots available for Wasteland. The other problem is that Wasteland has been around long enough for people to know what "brand" slot they want to "buy".

So I think we should try and "sell" them a King of the Hill slot. This is why... King of the Hill is new and growing, to me it seems like it is doing what Wasteland did when it first came out and maybe one day might be bigger than Wasteland. Also out of all the King of the Hill slots that are available pretty much all of them are being used to a point that when trying to connect to a server there is a high likely hood that you would need a reservists slot to joint. I would think that means there are not enough King of the Hill server slots being produced. So why wouldn't we fill that demand?

As for running missions we could run the server as King of the Hill during the week then on the weekend run it as an event server. This is something that Talkos was talking about and I think he might be better as explaining than me.

Another thing that I noticed it that if I use "TPG" or "TeamPlayerGaming" as the filter I cannot find out server but yet gametracker says that the server in alive.

I have started your admin vote.