Walker Diffrence

**kyle700** · 04-18-08, 03:05 PM

Really, is there any diffrence? Which one is better? I mean, does one of them have certien advantages over the other?

**FragRaptor** · 04-18-08, 03:06 PM

The T39 has more kick.
All PAC guns have more kick with their big ass 50 cal :4

**nsRaven** · 04-18-08, 03:15 PM

The PAC walker is definitely better than the EU walker in my opinion. I'm always getting the feeling that one of the machine guns on the EU walker doesn't work properly the majority of the time.

**FrauBlucher** · 04-18-08, 03:57 PM

whichever one has cebe, pasha, or hinder in it, usually is the better walker

Originally Posted by firework700

Really, is there any diffrence? Which one is better? I mean, does one of them have certien advantages over the other?

**Mcstrange** · 04-18-08, 04:20 PM

I forget the order but one has unlimited AA bullets and limited main bullets, and the other the reverse. Other than that they are equal other than personal preference

**Blah64** · 04-18-08, 05:29 PM

EUs Rieseg is much better.

It's my walker of choice. Faster rate of fire, ability to shoot through fences, a cooler design, and knowing you aren't in some sucky commy gear.

I personally think it has a smaller hitbox as well.

**DJ Ms. White** · 04-18-08, 05:32 PM

The Rieseg has the .50 guns which are good for anti-infantry. The commy plasma guns are better for shredding vehicles and air craft.

**WorstPE** · 04-18-08, 08:56 PM

I like the EU. Just my preference

and Mury, Nothing on either walker is unlimited, unless, I think, the AA EMP missiles are.

**kyle700** · 04-18-08, 08:58 PM

I always thought that the EU teams walker was better, because of the guns. The PACs guns dont do shit against vehicles, besides rockets

**FragRaptor** · 04-19-08, 07:13 AM

The EU's walker is worse, it has large hitboxes as seen by the underside vents.

Originally Posted by DJ Mr. White

The Rieseg has the .50 guns which are good for anti-infantry. The commy plasma guns are better for shredding vehicles and air craft.

Actuly the L5's guns are really better for AA with a fast rate of fire allowing to get alot of hits on the air vehicle fast. The T39 is better anti-infantry, one shot to the head kills infantry, not in the case of the L5, as well the T39 can shoot pilots out of their seats on air transports.

Originally Posted by firework700

I always thought that the EU teams walker was better, because of the guns. The PACs guns dont do shit against vehicles, besides rockets

Actuly, the PAC walker is a very great anti-FAV if used right, and the EU guns dont do crap against heavy vehicles either, as a matter of fact if guns did do damage to heavy vehicles, it would be PAC because of the larger caliber.

Originally Posted by FrauBlucher

whichever one has cebe, pasha, or hinder in it, usually is the better walker

Originally Posted by firework700

Really, is there any diffrence? Which one is better? I mean, does one of them have certien advantages over the other?

Pretty much.

Originally Posted by WorstPE

I like the EU. Just my preference

and Mury, Nothing on either walker is unlimited, unless, I think, the AA EMP missiles are.

Just in case you havent seen the storyline of BF2142 PAC wins most of the battles, and as a matter of fact NS is EU's counter strike. The whole game is about PAC winning and EU loseing.

PAC is so FTW you all don't know it 8)