Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: smaller conquest map for server start?

  1. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    10-06-07
    Location
    Killeen
    Posts
    1,714
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start?
    #1

    smaller conquest map for server start?

    Hey, just wondering if it would be feasable to consider a map rotation change to allow a smaller map start the rotation. 2 that come to mind are Tunis and Gibralter. I think it's an easier way to get the evening started.. I think more players would join sooner also. Sidi is a harder map in my opinion to play with limited players, not as enjoyable as the others are. We were able to get a change last night to Tunis, the map seemed to fill up faster than normal. Sidi is cool to let people play in the gunships before the map starts, but sucks when the game actually starts with just 8 players. Just an opinion/observation. Post up your thoughts either way here!
    Brian

  2. Registered TeamPlayer WileECyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-28-07
    Location
    Richardson, TX
    Posts
    17,410
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    3
    Stat Links

    smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start?
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: wileecyte WileECyte's Originid: WileECyte
    #2

    Re: smaller conquest map for server start?

    Generally, they pick titan/large maps because of the vehicle factor. The people priming can get out and fly gunships, run around in tanks/FAVs, etc. Makes it more interesting for extended priming.

  3. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    10-06-07
    Location
    Killeen
    Posts
    1,714
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start?
    #3

    Re: smaller conquest map for server start?

    I understand that and appreciate it. I just think that a smaller map would make for better play (once the game starts with less than 10)
    Brian

  4. Registered TeamPlayer Methuselah's Avatar
    Join Date
    09-28-07
    Posts
    2,780
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start?
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: thethirdson
    #4

    Re: smaller conquest map for server start?

    it seems the "likely to get primed : initial fun factor" ratio is as good as it can get right now. Smaller maps in the beginning might mean the map not getting primed at all because people give up on gettin it started sooner than they would if they had some gunships. But then again, the smaller map might make more people join because they'd be willing to play a 4 on 4 with a smaller map, and not so willing to play a 4 on 4 on Sidi. I see both ways holding weight, but ever since Jesus first started this discussion with the disciples, the topic has cyclically come up.
    Methuse•lah [muh-thoo-zuh-luh, -thooz-luh]
    noun
    1. a patriarch who lived 969 years. Gen. 5:27.
    2. an extremely old man.
    3. a very large wine bottle holding 61/2 qt. (6 l).

  5. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    10-06-07
    Location
    Killeen
    Posts
    1,714
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start?
    #5

    Re: smaller conquest map for server start?

    OK, I guess I am the only one that liked this idea..
    Brian

  6. Registered TeamPlayer Cybs's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-24-08
    Location
    The Colony, TX
    Posts
    2,546
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start?
    #6

    Re: smaller conquest map for server start?

    I could be wrong about this but when the server crashes, it starts with the first map. If it's a 8v8 map at the start, that's what we'll end up with say at 8PM which is pretty much prime time which means not everyone can get back on. Although I like the theory of it, I believe the implimentation would be horrible.

  7. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    10-06-07
    Location
    Killeen
    Posts
    1,714
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start?
    #7

    Re: smaller conquest map for server start?

    I was not suggesting it be an 8v8 map. I was stating that some maps are easier than others with a low number of players...
    Brian

  8. Registered TeamPlayer Awesom-O's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-04-08
    Location
    Tucson, AZ.
    Posts
    1,932
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start?
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: awesom_o Awesom-O's Originid: AwesomOh
    #8

    Re: smaller conquest map for server start?

    Perhaps this idea has been long since discovered, but why not lower the amount to commence a game from 4v4 to 3v3?

    I'm cool with the current maps as is to prime with. Like what Wile said, it's a bit more interesting to have equipment to mess with with.
    Hot-dogs in your buns! << why did I write this, I forgot and what was I thinking?!


    www.ArtForTheBody.com

  9. Registered TeamPlayer WileECyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-28-07
    Location
    Richardson, TX
    Posts
    17,410
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    3
    Stat Links

    smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start?
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: wileecyte WileECyte's Originid: WileECyte
    #9

    Re: smaller conquest map for server start?

    To lower the number that's required to start, the size of the map would need to be lowered. For 64 player maps, the start is always 4v4.

  10. Registered TeamPlayer Awesom-O's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-04-08
    Location
    Tucson, AZ.
    Posts
    1,932
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start? smaller conquest map for server start?
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: awesom_o Awesom-O's Originid: AwesomOh
    #10

    Re: smaller conquest map for server start?

    Quote Originally Posted by WileECyte
    To lower the number that's required to start, the size of the map would need to be lowered. For 64 player maps, the start is always 4v4.
    Hot-dogs in your buns! << why did I write this, I forgot and what was I thinking?!


    www.ArtForTheBody.com

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Title