Page 6 of 9 FirstFirst 123456789 LastLast
Results 51 to 60 of 89

Thread: Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA

  1. Registered TeamPlayer FragRaptor's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-11-07
    Posts
    9,651
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: FragRaptor Steam ID: FragRaptor
    #51

    Re: Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA

    Is it possible we could get titan verdun again :O

  2. Registered TeamPlayer SpankyMcFly3's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-15-07
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    2,389
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: SpankyMcFly3
    #52

    Re: Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA

    2142 Karkand

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA-screen018-jpg

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA-screen021-jpg

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA-screen022-jpg

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA-screen024-jpg

  3. Registered TeamPlayer SpankyMcFly3's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-15-07
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    2,389
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: SpankyMcFly3
    #53

    Re: Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA-screen031-jpg

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA-screen035-jpg

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA-screen042-jpg

  4. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    04-17-07
    Posts
    20,817
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    4
    #54

    Re: Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA

    Quote Originally Posted by FragRaptor View Post
    Is it possible we could get titan verdun again :O
    Sadly - I haven't heard anything about that

  5. Registered TeamPlayer SpankyMcFly3's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-15-07
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    2,389
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: SpankyMcFly3
    #55

    Re: Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA

    Quote Originally Posted by SpankyMcFly3 View Post
    Looks like they are directing some attention toward Verdun...



    http://forums.electronicarts.co.uk/b...691-whats.html
    Last edited by SpankyMcFly3; 07-07-10 at 01:58 PM.

  6. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    04-17-07
    Posts
    20,817
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    4
    #56

    Re: Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA

    Very cool info in that thread - just finished reading it. Thanks for the update Spanky

  7. Registered TeamPlayer WileECyte's Avatar
    Join Date
    10-28-07
    Location
    Richardson, TX
    Posts
    17,410
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    3
    Stat Links

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: wileecyte WileECyte's Originid: WileECyte
    #57

    Re: Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA

    Quote Originally Posted by FragRaptor View Post
    Is it possible we could get titan verdun again :O
    Don't get your hopes up. That was mere speculation on the part of a forum user.

  8. Registered TeamPlayer draco7891's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-11-08
    Posts
    3,700
    Post Thanks / Like
    #58

    Re: Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA

    Quote Originally Posted by SpankyMcFly3 View Post
    2142 Karkand
    Karkand in 2142 will suck hard.

    The primary measure of defense that the MEC has on Karkand is on being able to control access to the backfield flags by closing off the river. In BF2, that's accomplished by destroying the north bridge, heavily mining the southern land bridge, and watching for any APCs that try to float past through the water.

    In 2142, bridges are indestructible, so the north bridge can never be closed properly. In 2142, APCs cannot float, so the river has to be made shallow enough that they can cross anywhere, making mining the southern approach meaningless. Add in the APC launch pods (able to get all manner of troops to high vantage points and hidey-holes that are impossble to reach on an FF-on BF2 server), and it will be impossible for the PAC to effectively control or retain ownership of their backfield flags, unless that is all they ever focus their team on. At anything less than a full server, expect the PAC to lose consistently and without recourse.

    Stupid, stupid, stupid.

    Also, I don't know if they're just placeholders, but it looks like they're re-using quite a lot of the BF2 buildings on the map. Doesn't make sense that they would still be around and in exactly the same shape 200 years from now.

    Draco

  9. Registered TeamPlayer
    Join Date
    04-17-07
    Posts
    20,817
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    4
    #59

    Re: Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA

    Draco - as far as primary or only measures of defense being destroying a bridge not sure but I am thinking that some of the dynamics of the defensive weapons in 2142 could negate that necessity.

    There are several methods possible to stop APCs from crossing any stretch of territory. EMP Mines, Motion Mines, EMP Grenades, the faithful Pilum (hell that might even get walker back into the game) and the trusty old Jihad Jeep/FAV to name just a few.

    Also - as in Wake 2142 there is a land bridge connecting (submerged though) the two tips of the island. I'd imagine that it would be something along those lines as opposed to having to decrease the depth of the entire river.

    As for the really high spots - if the attackers can get up there - there is now reason why the defenders should not be able to knock them off (whether by getting up there themselves or orbital striking them into oblivion).

    I am intrigued to see what changes this brings to the games since the old maps, while fun, are a bit long in the tooth as all of the attack/defense strats are very well known by now. And since Jason Brice did the 2142-Karkand map, I hold out high hopes for it. He also did 2142-Shingle and that is a very fun map to play and fairly well balanced to boot (I've played both sides of that map and no one side seems to have a decided advantage).

  10. Registered TeamPlayer SpankyMcFly3's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-15-07
    Location
    San Antonio, Texas
    Posts
    2,389
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: SpankyMcFly3
    #60

    Re: Battlefield 2142 - 1.51 Closed BETA

    And rather than destroy the bridge a good rail gun placement or two would work pretty good defending that stretch. I can see the bridge not being demo'd and the river being deep all along it's run. An APC pod might make the jump of the river and that be the way to get behind the defense.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Title