Frustrating

**SpecOpsScott** · 04-28-11, 08:52 AM

Well, the last couple of nights have been a little better. Rush maps didn't seem to clear out the server. I was only able to play a couple of rounds last night, the the rush round i played as defender was a blow out. I don't think the attackers even set a charge until 3/4 into the round... when it flipped, we rolled the first two m-coms in less than a minute... then i had to jet. I'm guessing that may have cleared the server but as i left, some of the more experienced players were switching to the losing side.

**judedeath** · 04-28-11, 09:47 AM

Originally Posted by SpecOpsScott

Well, the last couple of nights have been a little better. Rush maps didn't seem to clear out the server. I was only able to play a couple of rounds last night, the the rush round i played as defender was a blow out. I don't think the attackers even set a charge until 3/4 into the round... when it flipped, we rolled the first two m-coms in less than a minute... then i had to jet. I'm guessing that may have cleared the server but as i left, some of the more experienced players were switching to the losing side.

It didn't clear the server, we did roll the whole map though, the next map we got spawn locked on Nelson bay with parachutes after that round I had to jet though so I don't know how it was after, I dont think we hit 30 though.

Sent from a frozen wasteland using Tapatalk

**WickedSoN** · 04-28-11, 11:51 AM

Originally Posted by xShades

Jude is right.

Low pop = easier for attackers.
High pop = easier for defenders.

10 on 10 is about perfect for Rush to be balanced. 16 on 16 is just too crowded to get things done.

In competitive 8 on 8 it was almost impossible to hold MCOMS against an equally skilled team. Both teams would inevitably push all the way to the last MCOMS and it was down to the wire for the win.

Of course if your teams are unbalanced pop does not even enter into the equation.

Conquest isn't as badly effected by population. High pop Conquest games are just as fun as medium to low. At the low end Conquest can get a tad boring but that's the same in any game mode.

Basically RUSH suffers on full or low servers..... Personally I think PUB rush servers should be 12/12 MAX.

This.

**SmokenScion** · 04-28-11, 03:26 PM

Originally Posted by judedeath

It didn't clear the server, we did roll the whole map though, the next map we got spawn locked on Nelson bay with parachutes after that round I had to jet though so I don't know how it was after, I dont think we hit 30 though.

Sent from a frozen wasteland using Tapatalk

another TPGer Ran out for some food........ and it bombed. If we could get SOME of those people who begged and pleaded for a Vanilla Sever to help us Prime/Pop the Server, things would be a lot smoother.

**SmokenScion** · 04-28-11, 05:23 PM

Originally Posted by SmokenScion

another TPGer Ran out for some food........ and it bombed. If we could get SOME of those people who begged and pleaded for a Vanilla Sever to help us Prime/Pop the Server, things would be a lot smoother.

After around 4 years here I've watched many "Second Servers" come and go. I've read the Threads "We will populate it, please just give us_____." And I've Read the threads "Due to Low Populations we closed the Second _______ Server" Too many times.

HeavyG
Coyote Warlady
Vexon
Jason_Jinx
Graverunner
insanegammer109
Water Dumple
Dusk3

These were the Loudest Voices FOR VANILLA With the LEAST amount of BC2 play time. I know real life is Priority, But you should know that too before you posted you Needs/wants.
There are MANY more of you who Voted (35 total) For a Vanilla Server.
Step on out of the woodwork, and Log On!

**deputyfestus** · 04-28-11, 08:06 PM

Originally Posted by SmokenScion

I think the Rush maps don't do quite as well, anyone Agree?

Totally agree personally I don't care for rush mode, I was thinking squad deathmatch for a pace changer. Just my 2 cents.

**Partyball** · 04-29-11, 06:40 AM

Originally Posted by deputyfestus

Totally agree personally I don't care for rush mode, I was thinking squad deathmatch for a pace changer. Just my 2 cents.

That is only 16 plays though.

**deputyfestus** · 04-29-11, 07:45 PM

Originally Posted by Partyball

That is only 16 plays though.

Doh!!

I haven't played it just sounded kinda fun, but only 16 ain't gonna get it.

**Coyote Warlady** · 04-30-11, 11:12 AM

Originally Posted by SmokenScion

After around 4 years here I've watched many "Second Servers" come and go. I've read the Threads "We will populate it, please just give us_____." And I've Read the threads "Due to Low Populations we closed the Second _______ Server" Too many times.

HeavyG
Coyote Warlady
Vexon
Jason_Jinx
Graverunner
insanegammer109
Water Dumple
Dusk3

These were the Loudest Voices FOR VANILLA With the LEAST amount of BC2 play time. I know real life is Priority, But you should know that too before you posted you Needs/wants.
There are MANY more of you who Voted (35 total) For a Vanilla Server.
Step on out of the woodwork, and Log On!

Seriously?

Did you miss where I didn't agree to have a second server, Vanilla server??

Oh and ask the Hardcore people if they see me in the server a lot lately? They will say no. Now I have to justify myself because I stated my opinions in a poll in the past about Vanilla?

I sure wasn't the one that started that shit about having a Vanilla server... In fact please read and you will see that I disagreed.

So don't be calling me out because you are barking at the wrong tree right now.

**Coyote Warlady** · 04-30-11, 12:24 PM

Since I’ve been called out, well here’s my opinions about that thread about BC2 Vanilla and Hardcore.

Oh and by the way Smoken... who was the one that started this shit? Certainly not me but Triggerhappy2005:

http://www.teamplayergaming.com/batt...r-harcore.html

So let me start:

First: jason_jinx types

Regular.

Its leans more toward the name of teamplayer. Hardcore leans more towards every man for himself.

So I was agreeing with Jason and giving my opinion that Hardcore has less teamplay than Vanilla with this:

I didn't even read the rest until Jason posted this... I feel the same as Jason 100%... no make it 200%. Although Hardcore is more realistic and cool but it does create ALOT of campers in the game, mostly snipers, which create to me a non TeamPlay atmosphere. It frustrates me to hell when my team is "attackers" and half of my team camps and not doing anything. I said it before and will say it again, when on the attacking team "Less campers... MORE ATTACKERS!!". it's really hard and frustrating to have only one squad (your squad) going for the objective while the rest of the team are camping... So YES!!! Hardcore DOES create alot of campers instead of real TeamPlayers....

Second: Again the next quote is my opinion of Hardcore being a non teamplay. Agreeing with what some players were saying about Hardcore = campers.

But Attracting HC playerbase = NON TEAM PLAYERS!!! It's crazy the difference between regular and hardcore. I seen it in TPG and alot of other TPg'ers did as well.

Sorry to say but my observation about hardcore to me = NON CAMPING TEAMPLAYERS!!! It's so bad that I want to leave the server when this happens and it does happen alot lately.

Third: judedeath misread one of my posts/opinion.

Thank you max and potem, That would be perfectly fine, I just get all into it when people(warlady) say no to that idea and say we should just get rid of HC.

My opinion again was this:

[quote]Wait just a minute here. I never said that we should just get rid of HC, maybe I mistyped or you misread... I said that HC does promote more campers compared to vanilla, and yes I said no to moving target's suggestion for another server, I know I didn't really explained why I said no but the reason is what Potemkine wrote:

The issue is can we keep both servers consistently primed. And right now, i really don't think we have the population base.

And then my opinion was this

My apologies if I wasn't clear of my opinion and reasoning as to why I said no.

With all of this, I'm just sharing my opinion and no one needs to "get all into it because Warlady said her opinion". Don't worry judedeath about me, I have an opinion just like you but am not an admin or decision maker here.

Now with all this, I really hope you understand that I was stating my opinions about Hardcore and disagreeing on getting a second server. I can quote more and explain to you what I meant but it’s a beautiful day outside and I ain’t going to waste my time with people calling me out when you have no clue what you are talking about!! I give you what I stated above and I’m turning the page on this one because it is very ridiculous to me.

PS: Maybe there's a reason why I don't play Vanilla because a certain individual just don't stop getting on my nerves about me being a French Canadian, and other stupid talking shit I don't want to listen in TS3 while playing the game? Even if the individual says it jokingly, this person doesn't know when to stop....

/Out!