Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 29

Thread: Some really bad maps for 64 players...

  1. Registered TeamPlayer Gunny's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-05-07
    Location
    Magnolia, TX
    Posts
    1,583
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players...
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: super_gunny Gunny's Originid: Super1_Gunny
    #11

    Re: Some really bad maps for 64 players...

    Quote Originally Posted by Vexon View Post
    Keep all the jet maps and we're good. AND I'm not just saying that for the jets, I'm saying it because the jet maps seem more open and bigger. All the non-jet maps are way to crumbled and squished.
    i agree

  2. Registered TeamPlayer Vexon's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-10
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    3,347
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Stat Links

    Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players...
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: Hunter57Rules Steam ID: Vexon57 Vexon's Originid: Vexon57
    #12

    Re: Some really bad maps for 64 players...

    Let me expand on my last post:

    Keep all the jet maps and we're good. AND I'm not just saying that for the jets, I'm saying it because the jet maps seem more open and bigger. All the non-jet maps are way to crumbled and squished.
    I don't even care if it's only....what? three, four maps? They are ten times better than these little maps that are 1/8 the size of the BF2 maps though and I could deal with playing them all day. Also, I looked in the server browser and found servers that said "AIR MAPS ONLY" on them and they were ALWAYS full. Even if it was like 9:00 AM they were still full. What I am saying is people like the air maps too (maybe just for the jets though). The small maps are most definitely NOT made for 64 players. They are made for like 32 players.

    I made a little picture thingy below of what I think we should keep, not keep, and don't really care:


    http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/2341/tpginfo.jpg

    If you guys don't take these maps out, though. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE TAKE OUT METRO. It was not even meant for conquest and there is no way to really sneek behind the enemy and back cap them unless you are the luckiest man in the world. It is really just a long straight stretch if you look at the map. Conquest is supposed to be a giant circle-like map where you can sneek around and all of that. METRO IS JUST SPAM and a whole lot of it.

  3. Registered TeamPlayer Vexon's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-10
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    3,347
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Stat Links

    Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players...
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: Hunter57Rules Steam ID: Vexon57 Vexon's Originid: Vexon57
    #13

    Re: Some really bad maps for 64 players...

    Quote Originally Posted by Vexon View Post
    Let me expand on my last post:

    Keep all the jet maps and we're good. AND I'm not just saying that for the jets, I'm saying it because the jet maps seem more open and bigger. All the non-jet maps are way to crumbled and squished.
    I don't even care if it's only....what? three, four maps? They are ten times better than these little maps that are 1/8 the size of the BF2 maps though and I could deal with playing them all day. Also, I looked in the server browser and found servers that said "AIR MAPS ONLY" on them and they were ALWAYS full. Even if it was like 9:00 AM they were still full. What I am saying is people like the air maps too (maybe just for the jets though). The small maps are most definitely NOT made for 64 players. They are made for like 32 players.

    I made a little picture thingy below of what I think we should keep, not keep, and don't really care:


    http://img9.imageshack.us/img9/2341/tpginfo.jpg

    If you guys don't take these maps out, though. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE TAKE OUT METRO. It was not even meant for conquest and there is no way to really sneek behind the enemy and back cap them unless you are the luckiest man in the world. It is really just a long straight stretch if you look at the map. Conquest is supposed to be a giant circle-like map where you can sneek around and all of that. METRO IS JUST SPAM and a whole lot of it.

    By the way i know I spelled neutral wrong in the picture.

  4. Registered TeamPlayer psychonitrous's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-04-08
    Posts
    491
    Post Thanks / Like
    #14

    Re: Some really bad maps for 64 players...

    You may want to change the colors around as psychologically people view red as bad.

  5. Registered TeamPlayer CivilWars's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-13-07
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    42,785
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    5
    Stat Links

    Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players...
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: CivilWars CivilWars's Originid: CivilWars
    #15

    Re: Some really bad maps for 64 players...

    More pew pew, less QQ!!


  6. Registered TeamPlayer Vexon's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-10
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    3,347
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Stat Links

    Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players...
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: Hunter57Rules Steam ID: Vexon57 Vexon's Originid: Vexon57
    #16

    Re: Some really bad maps for 64 players...

    Quote Originally Posted by CivilWars View Post
    More pew pew, less QQ!!

    Don't even!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  7. Registered TeamPlayer CivilWars's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-13-07
    Location
    Fort Worth, TX
    Posts
    42,785
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    5
    Stat Links

    Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players...
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: CivilWars CivilWars's Originid: CivilWars
    #17

    Re: Some really bad maps for 64 players...

    As has been mentioned who knows how many times:

    "TPG is a full rotation server. Unless a map has a flaw that causes glitching or crashing it will not be removed."

    You can make all the cool posts you want, even with great graphics presentations, about which maps you like and which you hate, but it won't change anything.

    Clear enough?


  8. Registered TeamPlayer Vexon's Avatar
    Join Date
    07-28-10
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    3,347
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    1
    Stat Links

    Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players...
    Gamer IDs

    Gamertag: Hunter57Rules Steam ID: Vexon57 Vexon's Originid: Vexon57
    #18

    Re: Some really bad maps for 64 players...

    Quote Originally Posted by CivilWars View Post
    As has been mentioned who knows how many times:

    "TPG is a full rotation server. Unless a map has a flaw that causes glitching or crashing it will not be removed."

    You can make all the cool posts you want, even with great graphics presentations, about which maps you like and which you hate, but it won't change anything.

    Clear enough?

  9. Registered TeamPlayer SmokenScion's Avatar
    Join Date
    11-27-06
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    11,452
    Post Thanks / Like
    Blog Entries
    13
    Stat Links

    Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players...
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: SmokenScion SmokenScion's Originid: SmokenScion
    #19

    Re: Some really bad maps for 64 players...

    What about Pie Graphs? Everyone Likes Pie graphs!

  10. Registered TeamPlayer Blood_Thirst's Avatar
    Join Date
    06-29-07
    Location
    Mesa,AZ
    Posts
    1,730
    Post Thanks / Like
    Stat Links

    Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players... Some really bad maps for 64 players...
    Gamer IDs

    Steam ID: Blood_Thirst Blood_Thirst's Originid: BIood_Thirst
    #20

    Re: Some really bad maps for 64 players...

    Mmmmm, PIE!!

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Title