Reducing Player Health To 80%

**maximusboomus** · 12-14-11, 05:35 PM

I don't mind, I played a few hardcore servers today and I can say I didn't noticed dying faster, in fact I found it just simply more realistic. The server currently runs at 100%, Tenrou is simply offering a 20% decrease, honestly it probably won't change much game play wise, simply put it will allow people flanking and surprising will allow you to take out 2-3 people rather than kill 2, and get shoot by the third... I don't mind either way, voted yes simply because I know we wouldn't see the difference. If we ran a rush server it would be nice to run it as a hardcore server?

**619summon** · 12-14-11, 05:37 PM

Originally Posted by maximusboomus

I don't mind, I played a few hardcore servers today and I can say I didn't noticed dying faster, in fact I found it just simply more realistic. The server currently runs at 100%, Tenrou is simply offering a 20% decrease, honestly it probably won't change much game play wise, simply put it will allow people flanking and surprising will allow you to take out 2-3 people rather than kill 2, and get shoot by the third... I don't mind either way, voted yes simply because I know we wouldn't see the difference. If we ran a rush server it would be nice to run it as a hardcore server?

just like you didnt mind after you took her home and found out she was really a man!!!

**SmokenScion** · 12-14-11, 05:42 PM

I don't think that logic applies to sheep....

**moving-target** · 12-14-11, 05:47 PM

learn how to aim you pansies

**Guyver** · 12-14-11, 06:02 PM

I'll soon start playing BF3 at TPG and I say emphatically....NO. They do this exact thing on some DoD:S servers....and it's just stupid, in my opinion. It dumbs down the game. Learn to aim and play the game, as it's intended.

**Shnark** · 12-14-11, 06:40 PM

I would enjoy being able to take people down easier, but I can see why so many don't like this idea. Personally, I don't like how multiplayer games really try and make the skill disparity less of a big deal. If you are good, you should top the charts. Like everything else though, its a balancing act.

**WickedSoN** · 12-14-11, 06:53 PM

How is reducing the health to 80% going to make this game more enjoyable? Coming from someone who played BC2 HC almost exclusively, I can tell you I am/was equally effective in both game modes. It comes down to changing your gameplay style to fit the mode. I find I am more bold in normal mode now and honestly - I like the change. HC mode had the problem of 1 hit snipers and 1 hit BS weapons (like 870 w/ slugs), this is something i absolutely do not miss at all. Seemed slightly more strategic, but the gay factor of some of the 1 hit weapons outweighed it. I've only played HC mode in Bf3 a few times and I left the servers before any round ended because I did not feel like changing my gamestyle yet again. I don't see how dropping everyone's health by 20% is going to make this game any better.

**BuddyLee.** · 12-15-11, 09:45 AM

I like it the way it is, but then again I haven't played any HC servers. Like wickedson said "I did not feel like changing my gamestyle yet again."

BL