Maps we don't need!

**Sel Gomez** · 07-13-12, 12:02 PM

I was just starting a thread so that people could comment and put in place maps that are not needed on the servers. I find that a lot of times when nobody nominates a league map, we end up with a bunch of random maps as choices. For example, when there are no league maps in the options then something like de_aztec gets picked. What is the point of having de_aztec as a map. Every time it gets voted for, it is instantly rtv'd. Just a thought.

Sel

**CivilWars** · 07-13-12, 12:15 PM

Every time we switch to ANY map people RTV. People should learn to play something besides D2 and Season 24/7.

**Adretheon** · 07-13-12, 12:18 PM

We played Aztec yesterday, cause I kept calling people pussies for rtving. T's raped ass, and I laughed.

But seriously, if you rtv off of a map that isn't CS_ or just complete shit then you are a pussy. And not the good pussy, I'm talking toothpick on a 10 lane tunnel pussy.

And we have maps like Aztec, Cbble, contra(don't even get me started on maps we don't need when we have that shit map on here), etc. cause those maps require more teamplay from the T's than something like D2 or temple or Strike stc.

**Mango_Attack** · 07-13-12, 12:52 PM

we need more maps ya

**The Meat Shield** · 07-13-12, 12:53 PM

I personally believe half of the people on this server are as good as they are simply because they have played certain maps too much. If you get them on a map they don't play alot (Aztec) versus me then I actually do well

**benmoo** · 07-13-12, 01:00 PM

If we don't like the maps that people are voting on, we could always do a fixed map rotation. Then that rotation is voted on in a community setting on a regular basis and you can raise your concerns/grievances at that time.

**Sosiego** · 07-13-12, 01:17 PM

I've taken part in numerous instances where maps like de_aztec were played all the way through. They were actually quite enjoyable. It's one thing if the players (on both sides) take a "this isn't a league map" or an anti-unpopular-map attitude and essentially just goof off. It's quite another thing when both sides attempt to play like a team (i.e. the TPG style of play).

That said, though, I would like to see some additional custom maps added to the server. I have a list of probably 6-12 custom maps that I'd like to see tested for TPG worthiness by the members here. However, as pessimistic as it may sound, given the popularity of the majority of the custom maps we currently have it doesn't really seem like it would be worth the effort.

**The Meat Shield** · 07-13-12, 01:17 PM

I'm worried the rotation size. Say we did a set rotation of this:

Dust2
LostTemple
Inferno
Mill
Strike

we would be missing out on great maps like navarro and rush which do occassionally get played with few objections

**benmoo** · 07-13-12, 01:20 PM

Originally Posted by The Meat Shield

I'm worried the rotation size. Say we did a set rotation of this:

Dust2
LostTemple
Inferno
Mill
Strike

we would be missing out on great maps like navarro and rush which do occassionally get played with few objections

Then make it a larger rotation. And you can vote to include navarro.

**The Meat Shield** · 07-13-12, 01:22 PM

haha true true. I truly don't mind the current system. I don't think it's flawed, but I do hate some of the maps that are extremely popular. I'll be honest I HATE Strike....