2v2 Tournament Thingy

**Wishbear** · 07-25-10, 04:53 PM

Originally Posted by 3manno

I like the idea. I would obviously need to play for a month or two, to be of any use shot wise. I would prefer aztec and train. They are both great 2v2 maps. Dust2 and Seasons have the bombsites too far from apart and IMO do not make for fun 2v2 maps. Nuke is kind of fun maybe that could be the tiebreaker.

I really think to have an enjoyable 2v2 match the sites need to be close together. I'm trying to think of other maps but those 3 are really good 2v2 maps. Even the original dust would be ok. I also think the hostage maps are not fun competitively so I wouldn't want to play any of those.

Just some thoughts.

Or you could grow a pair and play a hostie map because they are more fun small sided and competitive.

**CivilWars** · 07-25-10, 04:54 PM

CS maps are lame. 99.99% of the time the CTs win not by objective, but by killing all the Ts.

**3manno** · 07-25-10, 05:13 PM

Originally Posted by CivilWars

CS maps are lame. 99.99% of the time the CTs win not by objective, but by killing all the Ts.

Agreed, CS maps are definitely not competitive maps. However, they are fun to play from time to time but when trying to scrim, you need to do DE maps.

**Wishbear** · 07-25-10, 05:26 PM

Disagree.... they are enjoyable but the playstyle is much different than DE maps... more sneaking and less bum rushing... which is why they are fun. A good CT team is able to debunk a barricaded in T side... just need to know how to play.

**3manno** · 07-25-10, 05:47 PM

Originally Posted by Wishbear

Disagree.... they are enjoyable but the playstyle is much different than DE maps... more sneaking and less bum rushing... which is why they are fun. A good CT team is able to debunk a barricaded in T side... just need to know how to play.

CS maps are teh sucksors

**GReYVee** · 07-25-10, 05:47 PM

Well in a 10v10 environment the design of most CS maps doesn't give much lean towards objective. I think if the T''s could only reach the hostages seconds before the CTs they would be much more like DE maps.

In 2v2 though hostage maps are abit more balanced.

**CivilWars** · 07-25-10, 07:29 PM

Originally Posted by GReYVee

Well in a 10v10 environment the design of most CS maps doesn't give much lean towards objective. I think if the T''s could only reach the hostages seconds before the CTs they would be much more like DE maps.

In 2v2 though hostage maps are abit more balanced.

This. In 10v10 the only time they are half way cool is when you can convince the whole T side to rush one choke point and get to the rescue site.

**DuDDy** · 07-26-10, 05:57 PM

I remember one time back with EvO, we were scrimming wmc at the time, and Jeff suggested we scrim office. We all started laughing, but then he snapped cuz he was super serious about it. It was prolly the funniest thing Ive ever heard.

**~~Cyanide~~** · 07-26-10, 09:19 PM

Originally Posted by DuDDy

I remember one time back with EvO, we were scrimming wmc at the time, and Jeff suggested we scrim office. We all started laughing, but then he snapped cuz he was super serious about it. It was prolly the funniest thing Ive ever heard.

HAHA! ReacTion scrimmed a team that wanted to scrim Militia. And they were serious! xD