Results 1 to 10 of 266
Thread: The fat lady is just clearing her throat now...
-
08-24-12, 07:53 PM #1
The fat lady is just clearing her throat now...
Unusually popular movie...FIRST BOX OFFICE: Anti-Obama Movie #1 - Deadline.com
Famously accurate prediction predicts Romney...
University of Colorado model points to big Romney win | The Daily Caller
I don't even think it'll be close. Momentum is building.
-
08-24-12, 08:00 PM #2
Re: The fat lady is just clearing her throat now...
I will watch it as soon as I can, not sure if "momentum is building".
CNN Poll: Obama 49%-Romney 47% among likely voters – CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
May I ask who you will be voting for this November?
-
-
-
08-24-12, 08:08 PM #5
Re: The fat lady is just clearing her throat now...
Really you did look at everything in this thread didn't you? http://www.teamplayergaming.com/news...pocrisy-2.html
I'm curious how can you vote for him? What logic in your mind says that he deserves your vote?
Edit: Or actually let's not make this too difficult, can you just list some good thing about him? Policies of his that you really like?
-
08-24-12, 08:14 PM #6
Re: The fat lady is just clearing her throat now...
I don't think it's rigged. As you know you can still win the presidency without winning the popular vote, it is the electoral votes that matter. I think it was Bush who one without winning the popular vote against Gore. Also according to your link, they have successfully predicted the winner since 1980, still I don't think the fat lady has sang just yet.
-
- Join Date
- 08-20-07
- Location
- Tempe, Arizona, United States
- Posts
- 1,418
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 2
08-24-12, 08:19 PM #7Re: The fat lady is just clearing her throat now...
Wow, we haven't even gotten through the conventions and no one is paying attention, but your calling this one. Nice.
-H
PS I'll just leave this here:
Confirmation bias - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
-
08-24-12, 08:21 PM #8
Re: The fat lady is just clearing her throat now...
Lol at that "prediction." Minnesota going for Romney?! A state that hasn't voted for a Republican since 1972? It immediately lost any and all credibility with me. It takes either a certain level of stupid or badly flawed methodology to come to that conclusion.
And from Nate Silver:
A Denver Post reporter asked me about this U. of Colorado election model. (1/5)
https://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/...94289116672000
It's late, so I'll be blunt: I saw their paper and I think there are glaring problems with their methodology. (2/5)
https://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/...94335472115713
The U. of Colo. model fits the equivalent of 7 unknowns to 8 elections. That's not a good idea. (3/5)
https://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/...94388429402112
The Colo. model also assumes huge effects from unemployment if incumbent is a Dem., but none if he's GOP. Hard claim to defend. (4/5)
https://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/...94455739609088
If you want a "fundamentals" model that shows Romney winning, the Hibbs model is a lot more sensible. http://bit.ly/SqgfnH (5/5)
https://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/...94539512434689
Also, it's false advertising to claim CU model has predicted the last 8 elections right. It's a new model. Hasn't predicted anything yet.
https://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/...96899911528448
Another huge flaw with that U. Colorado election model: it actually assumes a Dem incumbent does WORSE when state income growth is higher.
https://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/...78247336407040
So, for example, the U. Colo. model has Obama's vote dropping off MORE in Ohio because its economy is relatively good.
https://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/...78793296355328
It's surprising how often studies that fail a sanity check can pass peer review.
https://twitter.com/fivethirtyeight/...80283612274688
Again, LOL at this "prediction."
-
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks