Results 181 to 190 of 286
Thread: Loose Change????
-
-
01-25-13, 12:12 PM #182
Re: Loose Change????
Wasnt charged because there is no evidence according to the Federal Bureau of Investigation....funny how he is charged for the 1998 bombings but not 911....whats the difference? One terrorist attack in 1998 one terrorist attack in 2001 both by the same man....yet hes only charged for one of those...
-
-
01-25-13, 12:16 PM #184
Re: Loose Change????
I haven't looked into the 1998 attack, but I'm guessing it had to do with Osama not actively participating in the WTC attack. At best we could prove people from his organization committed the crime. It's more likely that it was simply considered an act of war, and thus a war crime, which gave our military first crack at Osama.
~Morningfrost
-
-
-
01-25-13, 12:51 PM #187
Re: Loose Change????
Last edited by dreaddman; 01-25-13 at 12:54 PM.
Sent from an undisclosed location.
-
-
-
- Join Date
- 02-13-07
- Location
- Fort Worth, TX
- Posts
- 42,785
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 5
01-25-13, 12:58 PM #190Re: Loose Change????
So let's look at facts. Depending on which "reputable" news source you subscribe to Adam Lanza either killed 20 kids with an AR, or it was in his trunk. Same place, same facts, yet two bipolar opposite stories. In other words, yes, believe everything you see on youtube.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks