Results 231 to 240 of 286
Thread: Loose Change????
-
-
- Join Date
- 11-13-07
- Location
- Plano, TX and Ruston, LA
- Posts
- 32,364
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 43
-
01-26-13, 07:39 PM #233
Re: Loose Change????
Check out the thermal map....its not like it was in a confined area...it was all three sites yet not around wtc 4,5, or 6....building 456 were obliterated yet they never fell.
Also remember that NASA didnt take that thermal image until the 16th....5 days later....temps were at 700 C at that point.Last edited by kANG; 01-26-13 at 07:41 PM.
-
-
-
01-26-13, 08:15 PM #236
Re: Loose Change????
Once again they only mentioned the towers which is 2 buildings. I never looked into what was on all the floors effected in both buildings. However They had in there report the towers both suffered the same type of damage that would allow the steel to reach its critical point.
But how did you like my explanation? I bet that was the first time that one was thrown out there.
-
-
01-26-13, 08:19 PM #238
Re: Loose Change????
Shit 2 weeks is nothing. Try 50 years with an expected 250 more years.
Centralia, Pennsylvania - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
-
-
01-26-13, 09:46 PM #240
Re: Loose Change????
I dont have a clue any more then any once else does. As far as i know no answer was ever given to why the fires stayed going for 2 weeks or what was fueling them. Fire is a tricky things when its concealed. It can smolder for god knows how long and erupt when fuel is added. Which is what happened when they were uncovered. Take a look at the core of the earth. Its been molten for how many million years or is it billions? If something is insulted good enough its loss of heat can be very minimal.
Trying to explain it away as it doesn't happen or it would have cooled by now just isnt reality.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks