Thread: I'm against gay marraige This is why

Originally Posted by SmokenScion

What changes? Will gay marriage change the fact that there are gay guys and gay girls in our locker rooms? They've always been there so why do you suddenly think that they are checking you out?
Just tell them you want a big ol diamond ring before they get into your pants sheesh.

Not realy. There was a time when meat gazing would earn you an ass kicking and it wasnt that long ago.

Originally Posted by PvtPrivate

Why is this still an issue?

Because you cant change the rules and shit on 1 group while thinking no one will speak up about it. Yeah i know i know what about how gays have been treated. Fact still remains you make another second class to make one feel better and thats what all of this is about.

Originally Posted by Alundil

Since this image is a relevant shot at this topic, literally....





But the lengths, twists and turns that this and the other religion topic have taken is amazing. Simply amazing.

Sounds like we got a ho on the line.

Originally Posted by deathgodusmc

Not realy. There was a time when meat gazing would earn you an ass kicking and it wasnt that long ago.

So by that same token, there should be (should have been) ass kickings for men "gazing" at women? Vice versa? Or do you see the double standard?

Originally Posted by deathgodusmc

Because you cant change the rules and shit on 1 group while thinking no one will speak up about it. Yeah i know i know what about how gays have been treated. Fact still remains you make another second class to make one feel better and thats what all of this is about.

Who, exactly, is made a "second class" by this and how?

Two simple questions. The answers ought to be easily explained if it's as cut and dried as many would like to think.

Sent via highly charged bolt of electricity.

I'm not disputing that fact. I know that there have been. My question was a pointed one. Is that (beating someone up for merely looking) good and right? Is it the correct thing to do? Does the "beater" know why the "beatee" was looking in the first place? My bet is on no in most cases. However, the point remains that beating someone (regardless of gender) is not the correct method of situation handling. And it probably wasn't "then" either barring extreme or extenuating circumstances.

So, I'll reiterate; Should someone, anyone, be beaten for "gazing" or looking, especially when the intent is unclear?


Who is relegated to a "second class" status by this change and how?

Originally Posted by Alundil

So by that same token, there should be (should have been) ass kickings for men "gazing" at women? Vice versa? Or do you see the double standard?


Who, exactly, is made a "second class" by this and how?

Two simple questions. The answers ought to be easily explained if it's as cut and dried as many would like to think.

Sent via highly charged bolt of electricity.

There have been for looking at women. However trying to say men and women are the same in this sense is utter nonsense and you know it. The world is full of double standards. Straights become a second class when you tell them suck it up instead of resolving the issue.

Originally Posted by deathgodusmc

There have been for looking at women. However trying to say men and women are the same in this sense is utter nonsense and you know it. The world is full of double standards. Straights become a second class when you tell them suck it up instead of resolving the issue.

How is a man ogling a person said man attracted to and better or worse or more acceptable based on the sexuality of the person said man is ogling?

Let me help you....
Thinking that the target of the ogling appreciates it more or less based on that person's sexuality is utter nonsense and you ought to know it.

As for the rest...
Not going to let your statement off the hook so easily.
Second Class....implies a loss of right/privilege/degradation of treatment......
So how, in this new world where gay marriage is allowed do you (or other heterosexual people) now fall into a second class status?

And to your last statement....which I can't wrap my head around the obtuseness of.....but I digress.... How is the "issue supposed to be resolved?"
Ignoring it isn't resolution.