Violence

**Xavsnipe** · 10-02-13, 06:29 PM

So the problem is evident: handguns.

**dex71** · 10-02-13, 06:34 PM

Originally Posted by Xavsnipe

So the problem is evident: handguns.

lol.

gangs.

**Xavsnipe** · 10-02-13, 06:42 PM

crap..I missed that line on the FBI report...where´d it say "killed by gangs" at?

**dex71** · 10-02-13, 06:45 PM

Originally Posted by Xavsnipe

crap..I missed that line on the FBI report...where´d it say "killed by gangs" at?

Just tired of blaming inanimate objects for the way people choose to use them. It's like fighting alcoholism by banning large cups.

**Guyver** · 10-02-13, 06:47 PM

Did someone say gangs?

The Jets will take you, Xav.

**DJ Ms. White** · 10-02-13, 06:52 PM

Take away my large cups and I still have my margarita, martini, high ball, sniffer, pint, and shot glasses (among others) along with plastic/paper cups bottles, cans, and steins. Let's not forget that in a pinch I can take the fruit molds for jello shots one step more alcoholic and just use hollowed out fruit for cups.

I don't have a problem. I just take a scientific approach to my consumption of alcohol, which requires thorough testing with controls. I just need government funding. BRB calling family members working for Congressmen. I'd broker a compromise, but I think only my sister has ever donated to a party other than the Repubs...and I'm lazy.

Now, off to poach eggs in wine.

**Nuckle** · 10-02-13, 07:00 PM

Originally Posted by DJ Mr. White

Take away my large cups and I still have my margarita, martini, high ball, sniffer, pint, and shot glasses (among others) along with plastic/paper cups bottles, cans, and steins. Let's not forget that in a pinch I can take the fruit molds for jello shots one step more alcoholic and just use hollowed out fruit for cups.

.

Excellent point sir. Excellent.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

**Red_Lizard2** · 10-02-13, 09:23 PM

Originally Posted by Xavsnipe

So the problem is evident: handguns.

If you go by data and science approach, restrictions on hand guns and lack of restrictions on semi-automatic rifles (and various shit) is a better idea. Theoretically t makes sense too. Hard to conceal the AR you use to shoot fools who step on your turf compared to a handgun.

**Nuckle** · 10-02-13, 09:33 PM

Originally Posted by Red_Lizard2

If you go by data and science approach, restrictions on hand guns and lack of restrictions on semi-automatic rifles (and various shit) is a better idea. Theoretically t makes sense too. Hard to conceal the AR you use to shoot fools who step on your turf compared to a handgun.

Using that logic you could also ban Black people. More specifically black males 16-25.

For the record I am not suggesting that.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

**dex71** · 10-02-13, 09:34 PM

Originally Posted by Red_Lizard2

If you go by data and science approach, restrictions on hand guns and lack of restrictions on semi-automatic rifles (and various shit) is a better idea. Theoretically t makes sense too. Hard to conceal the AR you use to shoot fools who step on your turf compared to a handgun.

Except that it doesn't work. Look at Chicago. HEAVY restrictions on handguns, and they are one of the most violent cities in terms of handguns.

It's not the hammer that built the house. It's the person swinging it.