Thread: New Wikileaks

Originally Posted by deathgodusmc

Let me know when the taliban or alqauda has a uniform. Common sense doesn't usually required a website link for someone to understand.

I wasn't asking you to prove that they didn't have uniforms, I know that. I was asking you to support your claim that they don't have uniforms so that they can blend in with civilians.

Originally Posted by ***COMMANDER***

What makes the terrorist a coward and I stand by it 100% is that they launch their attacks from within the civilian population in hopes of not being attacked and if they are pinpointed attacked and an innocent life is lost, they use it on their propaganda media.

Any army that wants to stand up and fight like a man and not a coward, declares their position by uniform and meets on a battleground to get it on, not in the suburbs of the civilian population, blending in with civilians and putting their lives at risk, which makes them a coward.

So have you changed your previous stance, or do you still agree that, since the Revolutionary war soldiers didn't wear uniforms, and practiced guerrilla warfare, they were cowards?

Originally Posted by deathgodusmc

Good question. My answer is no. Whats going on in Lybia is a revolution. The people have said enough is enough and want change. This is a case were average citezens have taken up arms to demand their rights. They have a clear set goal of what it would take to bring it to an end.

A terrorist is someone that persues their will be means of terror and make no distinction between civilian and military.

Granted i do see some similarities but in this particular case i would have to say no.

So, they're not terrorists, but are they cowards, since they're not in uniform?

Originally Posted by CivilWars

I am sure if you asked many of the detainees in Gitmo they would claim to be revolting against Western invaders trying to change their way of life in their country, thus making them revolutionaries. The lines are so gray these days that one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. It just depends on which side of the argument you are on.

Oh im sure about a million different reasons can be given for either side. So i have to go with my opinion and realise not everyone is going to agree.

Originally Posted by WickedTribe

I wasn't asking you to prove that they didn't have uniforms, I know that. I was asking you to support your claim that they don't have uniforms so that they can blend in with civilians.

I dont know maybe wehould go track down suicide bombers and ask them why they aren't wearing a uniform. Common sense can rule your question out.

Originally Posted by WickedTribe

So, they're not terrorists, but are they cowards, since they're not in uniform?

You must be dense. Im not even going to waste any more of my time on your nonsense.

Originally Posted by deathgodusmc

I dont know maybe wehould go track down suicide bombers and ask them why they aren't wearing a uniform. Common sense can rule your question out.

Incorrect.

Originally Posted by deathgodusmc

You must be dense. Im not even going to waste any more of my time on your nonsense.

Your arguments are inconsistent and arbitrary, insulting me wont' make them any less so.

Originally Posted by WickedTribe

Your arguments are inconsistent and arbitrary, insulting me wont' make them any less so.

It's pretty clear that you are just trying to start problems..... Anymore questions that you have for him, take it to a pm and quit stinking up this thread.....