Making a Murderer

**Warprosper** · 01-24-16, 09:14 AM

Anyone watch this?

I binged it yesterday, and holy shit. I feel for that guy. Innocent or Guilty, there were numerous scraps of evidence that were missing, and those that were there should have been dismissed. Unreal.

**SourceSkills** · 01-24-16, 01:35 PM

You would be surprised at how many people in our prison system are innocent and in a lot of cases didn't even have a trial. The manitowoc county law enforcement and judiciary system is still without a doubt a hopeless mess though. I was left speechless to be honest.

**CivilWars** · 01-24-16, 03:07 PM

I never watched any of this, and don't really have a clue about the story, but I found this interesting when everyone on FaceSpace was talking about it.

Donnie Wahlberg on 'Making a Murderer' - SPLASH

**Kanati** · 01-25-16, 09:33 AM

I'm not sure Marky Mark's brother is the best source of whodunnit. But interesting read.

**CivilWars** · 01-25-16, 10:29 AM

True, but are we, or even the people who made a TV show, any more qualified than him?

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

**Kanati** · 01-25-16, 11:25 AM

Nah. I just wanted to make a dig at Marky Mark and the Wahlburgers.

Personally I think he PROBABLY did it and deserves what he's getting. But I also think he got shafted on his trial and deserves a new, fair one.

**CivilWars** · 01-25-16, 11:27 AM

Our justice system is all kinds of fuxed up, no argument there. Not just this case, and not just in favor of the prosecution.

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

**DJ Ms. White** · 01-25-16, 01:49 PM

Originally Posted by Kanati

Personally I think he PROBABLY did it and deserves what he's getting. But I also think he got shafted on his trial and deserves a new, fair one.

Those are my thoughts as well.

**SourceSkills** · 01-25-16, 02:24 PM

I don't know the investigation was a complete farce and that blood vile was tampered with and that cannot be denied. If he is guilty that's fine but can somebody please explain the keys and the blood to me because those two things make no sense.

**Adretheon** · 01-25-16, 04:44 PM

Did they leave stuff out? Because from what I saw the State didn't really bring any evidence that was 100% concrete in proving he did it. The things that should have been has questionable surroundings to it(specifically around the testing of the evidence).

I don't know if he did it or not, but there are so many questionable things that it does raise doubt. And that was on the State to disprove. There's no question there's people who don't like him(even in his family) and one could have made a case against anyone of them, but from this it looked like they didn't even look at anyone else at all. That's the thing that gets to me. How could you not at least look into the other people just in case.