Who will you vote for in election 2008

**BigHub** · 08-10-07, 04:29 PM

I voted for Hub. Everyone knows that cat is going to run the white house.

Keg Party at the White House!

**...bigdog...** · 08-10-07, 04:34 PM

obama with 6? Do you people even watch the debates? I bet half of his 6 votes here can't even spell his first name right.

If you don't care, then don't vote.

**Red_Lizard2** · 08-10-07, 04:37 PM

I'd rather see Obama then Clinton or the traditional bullshit GOP. The one candidate i really want to see win but won't because he isn't traditional GOP is Ron Paul.

**BigHub** · 08-10-07, 04:46 PM

Fred Thompson FTW, all the rest of those people are chumps.

**...bigdog...** · 08-10-07, 04:48 PM

Ron Paul is insane.....watching him at the debates only solidified his complete and utter inability to lead.

he's like woody harrelson.......mumbling and stuttering and exasperated and......weak.

that's not a president. That's just someone who's good at complaining and criticizing presidents.

**jason_jinx** · 08-10-07, 04:58 PM

if i had to choose it would be

http://www.gravel2008.us/

**rock_lobster** · 08-10-07, 04:59 PM

Originally Posted by ...bigdog...

Originally Posted by Consultant

Originally Posted by rock_lobster

I will not vote for someone who is pro-choice (which is interpreted as a mother's right to choose.....). What happend to the babies rights? I do not know. But yeah, vote the person, not the party.

amen, brother.

so when it's Guiliani vs. Clinton, you're going to abstain and fuck us all?

You abstaining is going to put hillary clinton in the whitehouse. And for you....that is WORTH "not voting for someone that is pro-choice?".

...........you aint a teamplayer. Fight the ones you can win, man. Otherwise, the reign of hillary will destroy us all.

It was more like a, "I wont vote for a pro-choice candidate if that option is even available". Going back to what jason said, if everyone in election is pro-choice, then I will choose what I think to be the lesser of two evils.

**jason_jinx** · 08-10-07, 04:59 PM

The United States incarcerates more people and at a higher rate than any other peacetime nation in the world. According to the federal Bureau of Justice Statistics the number of US residents behind bars has now reached more than 2.3 million.

We are losing an entire generation of young men and women to our prisons. Our nation’s ineffective and wasteful “war on drugs” plays a major role in this. We must place a greater emphasis on rehabilitation and prevention. We must de-criminalize minor drug offenses and increase the availability and visibility of substance abuse treatment and prevention in our communities as well as in jails and prisons.

We must increase the use of special drug courts in which addicted offenders are given the opportunity to complete court supervised substance abuse treatment instead of being sentenced to prison. We must eliminate mandatory minimum sentencing laws. We must increase the use of alternative penalties for nonviolent drug offenders. Drug defendants convicted of nonviolent offenses should not be given mandatory prison sentences. We should emphasize the criminalization of the importers, manufacturers, and major distributors, rather than just the street venders. Prisons in this country should be a legitimate criminal sanction -- but it should be an extension of a fair, just and wise society.

http://www.gravel2008.us/issues

sounds good to me

**Langcaster** · 08-10-07, 05:10 PM

For me it was close vote between Rudy Giuliani and Mitt Romney. Third party voter think about your vote, I know yall not happy with any of your chooses. But you are giving your vote away for Hillary or Obama to win. Is that what you really want?