Results 1 to 10 of 51
Thread: Why are the politicians talking about $700 billion?
-
09-26-08, 12:46 AM #1
Why are the politicians talking about $700 billion?
A few days ago Laggy manned up and told me that I was talking above your heads. What Laggy did is what men do. They call each other out.
Most of you are young and don't understand why the politicians are talking about $700 Billion dollars. Here's what's going on.
America has been sold and our politicians are trying to buy it back. I'm not kidding. If I'm wrong then someone please call me out.
-
09-26-08, 12:53 AM #2
Re: Why are the politicians talking about $700 billion?
hey I am young (19) and I know what the hell they are talking about.
I wouldn't necessarily say that America has been sold. Its more of a combination of issues. Fast and loose lending policies...coupling with the busting of the housing market bubble, gas prices, and banks failing due to sketchy lending practices and lack of government controls.
Lots of stuff coming together. Hell we were due for a major panic anyway.Code:____ U ___ u _____ U _____ u __ __ ____ _ __ _ _ U _____ u U| _"\ u \/"_ \/|_ " _| \| ___"|/U|' \/ '|uU| _"\ u|"|/ / ___ | \ |"| \| ___"|/ \| |_) |/ | | | | | | | _|" \| |\/| |/\| |_) |/| ' / |_"_| <| \| |> | _|" | __/.-,_| |_| | /| |\ | |___ | | | | | __/U/| . \\u | | U| |\ |u | |___ |_| \_)-\___/ u |_|U |_____| |_| |_| |_| |_|\_\ U/| |\u |_| \_| |_____| ||>>_ \\ _// \\_ << >> <<,-,,-. ||>>_ ,-,>> \\,-.-,_|___|_,-.|| \\,-.<< >> (__)__) (__) (__) (__)(__) (__) (./ \.) (__)__) \.) (_/ \_)-' '-(_/ (_") (_/(__) (__)
-
- Join Date
- 11-13-07
- Location
- Plano, TX and Ruston, LA
- Posts
- 32,364
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 43
09-26-08, 12:55 AM #3Re: Why are the politicians talking about $700 billion?
Originally Posted by ebaconjrenf-Jesus its been like 12 minutes and you're already worried about stats?! :-P
Bigdog-Sweet home Alabama you are an idiot.
-
09-26-08, 02:53 AM #4
Re: Why are the politicians talking about $700 billion?
The problem, simply put, is that finacial institutions are so heavily indebted that they can't or won't extend credit anymore. The simple answer is to just let them fail. That is not an option. The Fed and treasury are not kidding when they say this is serious. Most in government agree. Where they differ on opinion is on details such as outgoing executive compensation and regulatory oversight.
I, for one, believe that any company whose illiquid assets are purchased should have to give an equity stake to the government (taxpayer) so that there is a good chance of us being paid back. I also believe that any outgoing execs should not recieve golden handshakes mainly as to serve a lesson to future wrongdoers. Lastly we must regulate. It's better to have a little too much brake than a runaway car. The notion that markets will figure it all out has been proven wrong. The core pillar of capitalism is greed. Left unchecked you get what we currently have.
-
- Join Date
- 01-28-07
- Location
- Arizona
- Posts
- 13,490
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 5
-
09-26-08, 07:20 AM #6
Re: Why are the politicians talking about $700 billion?
Originally Posted by triggerhappy2005
Regardless, I dont think its as simple and cut and dried as Bacon put it "America's been sold and we're buying it back" - That's sort of what's going on...but what its more like is "America went to college and spent its tuition on porn and beer and now needs a loan from its parents to pay the bills."
We bought stuff we couldnt afford, banks gave risky loans with little guarantee or underwriting, there was a push from the left toward more home ownership and a push from the right to realize the capitalist dream, and in the mean time, if I bought a Million dollar house I couldn't afford, the worst thing that could happen is that I get forclosed on and get my credit wrecked and then I rent an apartment...what I should have been doing anyway...To the lowest of the low, there was no downside to riding one of the ARM loans out and rolling the dice...
The American DREAM is a house with a white picket fence, 2 kids, 2 cars in the garage and a chicken in every pot.
The operative word is DREAM...not right or reality...
-
09-26-08, 07:25 AM #7
Re: Why are the politicians talking about $700 billion?
Bacon,
I think that in order to discuss the situation to some younger folks, as well as older folks such as myself who aren't economic gurus, rhetoric should be shelved.
It is clear that the economy doesn't care about what party you belong to right now, unless your assets are over 7 figures, you are probably sucking wind right now.
My understanding of a few variables that are in play.
A run away housing market for several years where many garden variety people were able to DOUBLE their money within 5 years on their homes. That rate of growth isn't real. It is the roughly same rate of growth that E-Business generated in the late 90s. Reality sets in at some point, the bubble pops, and things go downhill back to reality.
During this run up, lending rules were relaxed, there was no oversight of lending practices ( read regulation, and some is a good thing) was nil, people began to think that they could sign up for loans that there was no way they could repay, with the hope/wish/prayer that the value would continue go up and they could flip it and get paid. They got caught gambling and lost their ass. Now they owe more than the property is worth and are defaulting.
At this point, principles kick in. To me, if you sign up for a mortgage that you can't repay, you are a gambler/foolish/stupid. I live in a neighborhood that is below where I want to live. I live there because my wife and I bought a house that was about 1/2 of what I qualified for. I did this because I wanted to be certain I could afford it, even if I lost my job or something bad happened.
I don't doubt that the situation needs help, what kills me is that I live below my means, and will be forced to pay for the errors of fools who don't know how to do that. I don't feel any sympathy for the stories of forclosure, because they put themselves in that position. Their bad behavior will be rewarded by the govt (taxpayer(me)) stepping in.
Tell me where I am wrong on this one facet of the economic mess.
Clint
-
09-26-08, 07:27 AM #8
Re: Why are the politicians talking about $700 billion?
As I read all of the posts on this subject, I realize that almost all people don't understand what's going on. Last night, during a discussion with my economics girl, the situation came to light in my head.
The government is securing the retirement funds of millions of americans. You see, alot of these retirement funds disappeared. It's not because the companies screwed up. It's because of a combination of two things. People not being able to pay their mortgage, and people pulling their money out of real estate investments through companies like fidelity. People are pulling their money out of real estate investments in their 401k because the return is staggering due to people having trouble paying their mortgages. All of a sudden, a slow decline in money starts and then the dominoe effect takes over and every single person who has 401k or an IRA account removes their money from real estate because why would you want your money in an account that won't produce a return. The money that was disappearing are the retirements funs of millions of americans. Some of these folks spent decades saving money thinking that they would have a million dollars to live off of. Instead, they have like half that now. America is helping our old people and their future, you can't argue with that.
-
09-26-08, 07:33 AM #9
Re: Why are the politicians talking about $700 billion?
Originally Posted by Muqtar SGT_Clintok
-
09-26-08, 07:35 AM #10
Re: Why are the politicians talking about $700 billion?
I do agree with trigger that the exec compensation should be a target. What's the ditty bacon, the forbidden fruit? Ill gotten gains should up for grabs by litigation.
If I as a worker rip off my company by abusing perdiem for instance, I would be fired, and certainly be prosecuted, and the company would end up with their money back.
It isn't just the ceos though. There are many more guilty parties than the figurehead.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks