Thread: Your Tax Dollars at Work: Gays and Whores

Yes, you read that right, and I am not happy.

We are spending $400,000 to research "why gay men engage in risky sexual behavior while drunk" in Buenos Aires. That's right. Our economy is in the toilet, our military needs more funding, our schools need more funding, and we are spending 400K on finding why drunk gay men in Argentina do things that can cause them to contract AIDs.

We are also spending $2.6 million to try to get Chinese prostitutes to drink less and use protection while on the job. $2.6 million US tax dollars. Wasted on whores. And they aren't even American.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...titutes-drink/

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009...rgentina-bars/

And for those of you who say that FoxNews is biased...screw you. This stuff is fact. Get over it. They may not always be neutral, but someone has to report this stuff.

yeah your right, this money would be more well spent researching over reactive people trolling on the internet. :9

I agree. 12 year old asian whores need better protection.

Originally Posted by SAMBO

I agree. 12 year old asian whores need better protection.

That needed sigged.

If he ever gets out of his chopper..... :2

Tell you what....you pay me 10% of that amount and I'll tell you why gay men engage in risky behavior while drunk....BECAUSE THEY ARE FUCKING INTOXICATED, YOU DICK GOBBLING TARDS!!!!! It's the same mother fucking reason why hot chicks go home with the ugly guys after they have been drinking all night....their judgment is inhibited.

Can we get a new government please....apparently ours has gone bad.

I'm fully convinced, the money we would save by cutting out pointless programs such as these, could end the depression...seriously.... :5

Originally Posted by triggerhappy2005

Asianinator how come you're not in a humvee somewhere keeping us safe from the terrorists already? When's that gonna happen?

how delightfully on topic....


are you implying that to have an opinion on government spending and such, you must be overseas directly protecting freedom?


Have you not realized some people are much better serving their country by staying home? Anyone under the age of maybe 25 may be better served staying home, getting an education, making the next big discovery in armor or w/e to protect our troops...

Some people are more helpful getting a job, regulating the economy, making sure the soldiers have a nice place to come home to.



Quite frankly, by your logic, if everybody who supports the troops, believes in limiting government power, and wants to cut government spending enlisted, this country would be fucked up due to such a large portion of the population being overseas.