Thread: The missing link?

Atheism ftw.

Originally Posted by nsRaven

What if time travel is possible and in an experiment a thousand years from now, some scientist tosses some small primate lemur thing through a portal into the past and fails to retrieve it. 47 million years later we're digging it up and calling it the missing link. Just saying.

Well if Time Travel were possible, we'd be able to answer the question anyway non? We'd go back and see if Jesus existed etc.

Originally Posted by Cojiro

Originally Posted by AxisofLint

Originally Posted by nsRaven

What if time travel is possible and in an experiment a thousand years from now, some scientist tosses some small primate lemur thing through a portal into the past and fails to retrieve it. 47 million years later we're digging it up and calling it the missing link. Just saying.

Well if Time Travel were possible, we'd be able to answer the question anyway non? We'd go back and see if Jesus existed etc.

Well im pretty sure nobody denies the existence of the man Jesus.

/shrug

but if we could go back in time we could totally kill Hitler while hes on the john (scott evil style)

This has several outcomes, depending on your view of the time stream.

Essentially, either it wouldn't be possible, because you can't affect your own time stream, or it would be possible, but would create a paradox.

Originally Posted by Consultant

Originally Posted by hawgballs

And just because some pastor says that some mythological book is true, doesn't make it so.

AMEN!

By the way, that "someone with a degree" was Charles Darwin and his theory has withstood decades of scrutinization, and it has yet to be falsified, and is one of the cornerstones to modern science. Whereas there is no evidence that anything in your books are true.

epic lolz at the juxtaposition. The very absence of the missing link points to macro evolution being a theory - an unproven theory.

Wasn't there a longer title to his book dealing with races? Wasn't Darwin a white European supremacist? *stir stir stir*

I love it - as if the mysteries or the origin of man are supposed to disprove my faith. HA HA good sir.

Evolution provides more proof of existence than anything in your book. There is a lack of evidence of the presence of a god, or that some guy named Jesus was born through a virgin birth as the son of said god, or that he miraculously came back to life. You can prove that shit? Really? Can you provide any evidence at all of any of the things that I mentioned, other than it's in the bible so it has got to be true.

Oh and keep LOLz'ing as if your religion is connected with outright racism as late as the 1960's..... When Darwin, whose THEORY which has yet to be disproven, died in 1880's.

I'm not trying to disprove your faith, but when th likes of your faith try to push it onto everyone, as well as use your faith as evidence that all should adhere to your faith's principles then there is indeed something askew.

I find it funny that you don't demand proof of all of the myths in your book, yet you demand 100% proof positive that we as a species evolved from another species of mammal. I mean it isn't enough that you basically see thing evolving right in front of your eyes, yet you deride the possibility that evolution is a theory holds water completely. But you have yet asked anyone, even in our highly technological world if there is a possibility of turning water into wine, or if someone can instantly turn into a pillar of salt, or if there is any historical evidence or even a remote possiblity of lepers becoming healed instantly.

Now who is the hypocrite my friend?


Wow, after re-reading all of that,..........it was quite a rant. All relevant, but a rant nonetheless.