Results 11 to 20 of 55
Thread: Democracy
-
02-14-07, 03:17 PM #11
RE: Re: Democracy
Originally Posted by cap
should every user be given administrator rights on the website? How about the FTP passwords? Would you like those?
How about ban powers and map change powers? Should we just give those to everyone?
Your entire post is based on the ridiculous premise that a game server can be run by the people. We automate as many functions as we possibly can. Our admins are PROHIBITED from interfering in the map cycle, they are PROHIBITIED from arbitrarily restricting weapons, they are PROHIBITED from even banning people just becasue they feel like it, or have a personal issue with that player. Our admins are PROHIBITED from speaking as the wish, they are PROHIBITED from even playing as they wish, especially in CS. They are FORCED to set examples, carry burdens, and manage problems rather than play the game.
All of these things were established to give gamers control over their game, and get the admin out of their face. It's not as easy in the BF games, since we can't make automated vote scripts and simple admin GUI's.......but the votes are still there. both in game as user initiated map changes WHICH THE ADMINS DO NOT INTERFERE WITH, or in the website, where the popular opinion is ALWAYS adopted by the TTP admins.
I don't get your problem.....or if you even have a problem......but you done pissed off a lot of people with your post, cap.
Aren't you a teamwork affiliate? Weren't you caught up in their shit?
-
-
- Join Date
- 11-27-06
- Location
- Denver
- Posts
- 11,452
- Post Thanks / Like
- Blog Entries
- 13
-
02-14-07, 03:26 PM #14
Re: RE: Re: Democracy
Originally Posted by smokenspliff
maybe we should make another vote to fire me. But we already did me.
let's make a vote to fire grey mata.
-
02-14-07, 03:29 PM #15
RE: Democracy
Since we busted out some quotes. I like to quote Odawgg one of our founding members:
this is not a democracy, it's a cheerocracy.
Originally Posted by capnemo314
Originally Posted by capnemo314
Originally Posted by capnemo314
Originally Posted by capnemo314
Originally Posted by capnemo314
Where the fuck have we posted the word Democracy on the TTP Banner, Homepage or main forums.
Let's look at your residency here from Apartment Manager/Tenant relationship as the best analogy.
You have been leasing an apartment since Dec 02, 2006. So you have been here at the TexasTeamPlayers Apartments for 2 months and 12 days and today on Feb 14, 2007 you walk without any warning to file compilant to the Management about how the Management maintains and runs the property even though there is nothing wrong with your apartment unit, the ability to use the facilities, and get access to the property.
Now that we have summarized your compilant. As a representive of the TexasTeamPlayers Management. How do you expect myself or other managers to respond after being bitched out about nothing. Hmmm...
If for example was the ONLY PERSON who made the decision on you staying at my apartments. You ass would be evicted at 3:29 pm CST. Notice this post is at 3:30pm CST.
But wait. There is some form of Democracy at TexasTeamPlayers. We never had to post a sign at the front of the gate when you drive through the guest entrance since the Tenants and Admins here at TexasTeamPlayers Apartments have always greeted everyone with handshake and smile when they register to become permanent tenant and giving the foot in the ass and the finger to the evicted nonteamplaying, cal frontin', hacking, teamkilling and uninformed wannabes.
Which side of the property would you prefer to be on?"And the hits just keep on coming." - Tom Cruise, A Few Good Men
-
02-14-07, 03:48 PM #16
Re: Democracy
Ranger: The point that I am trying to make is that when we're posting on the forums, we should avoid saying something like 'TTP is a democracy, so suck it up.' The democracy bit is simply not true.
TTP is a server where the people in charge have built up a community and listen to it much more than on other servers. However, listening to your members is not the same as your members having an actual vote.
Originally Posted by capnemo314
Why am I complaining? It simply bothers me seeing somebody beaten down in the banned forums and then the explanation of 'we're a democracy' being used to show that TTP is superior.
Originally Posted by Ranger10
Now, I wasn't online at the time of this incident, and I am only using this as an example. I have no opinion on Toolbag's ban.
What I am protesting is that you implied my consent to the admin community's decision when I had no part in either deciding who the admins are, and had no say in the matter directly. If I had, then it would be another matter entirely.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, I do realize that those who primarily fund the server cannot trust any John Doe that comes along with admin priviliges. I realize that those who fund the server don't want a bunch of people that they don't know wasting their money. That's just a digression, although it is a valid point.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Voting by itself does not imply a democracy. When everybody votes on whatever the matter at hand is, then it's a democracy.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ravioli: I don't play CS:S, so I never have seen an awp vote.
Also, if you read the entirety of my post, you would have read this:
Originally Posted by capnemo314
Now, while I was going through the forums to get my quote from Ranger, I saw that bigdog had posted. I'll be typing up my response to that after this is posted. Please wait until I finish that before you start responding to this.
-
02-14-07, 03:51 PM #17
RE: Re: Democracy
At this point, we really are discussing somantics.
No form of government applies to this server but the one that fits the closest is a democracy because of the member's ability to affect their playing environment through rcon votes and the admins method of decision making being that of majority votes.
-
02-14-07, 03:57 PM #18
RE: Re: Democracy
Thats it. I am going to nominate Capnemo for a position as BF2 Low Admin and the community of Admins/Citizens "vote" him into "office" and see if contribute to this society of oligarchists as he has so gracefully put it, but unlike an oligarchy more like democracy numerous people will have elect him to becoming an admin and for some reason if he can't perform in office if his nomination is successful then similiar to a democracy were going to impeach his ass.
"And the hits just keep on coming." - Tom Cruise, A Few Good Men
-
02-14-07, 03:57 PM #19
RE: Re: Democracy
By stating that we're a democracy, you implied that I agreed that Toobag should be unbanned. If the ban had been sustained, then you would have been implying that I agreed that his ban should have been sustained.
Maybe you'd be happier in that it's a democracy to some, and not to others?
Your point on the banned forum is ridiculous. What should we do.....allow a clan to come in, register enough members, and then know they can run amuck, simply because they have enough votes to keep themselves ubanned? Maybe even vote themselves into office? Maybe even vote off games they dno't like?
LEST WE ALSO NOT FORGET, people can register for many, many accounts, all at once. One person can be hundreds of votes if they were so motivated. And for you to assume that we can leave all community decisions to the purest form of democracy is for us to assume that pure democracy can exist in a forum where registrations come and go, completely anonymous, and unregulated. And it can never be like that.
You seem pretty smart. And I bet you're going to try and counter some of my points. And that's fine. but given what I've already said.....you sticking to your point is simply you wnating to look defiant.....to somehow give yourself some sort of moral or intellectual edge.
You're not going to back down.....you're probably not even going to admit where we are right and you are wrong. And you certainly aren't going to go looking for votes you didn't bother to take part in.
So....then guess what we have to do? Like the nepotistic dictating oligarchs you so claim us to be.....we're going to have to silence you, simply because you aren't listening, and we don't have time to talk to someone who is deaf. And in your mind, that's going to justify everything you think about us........
but we know that in the general TTP population, it's more important for us to set the example with you, rather than allow you to speak. So, for the greater good, your rights and priveledges are violated, with no way by you at all. And.....a majority of TTP votes "do you like the admins": Yes.
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks